This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Dan Nicolaescu <dann at ics dot uci dot edu>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:36:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <20030210180736.GA24649@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <200302102028.h1AKS6kA027949@gremlin.ics.uci.edu>

On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Dan Nicolaescu wrote:

> 
> One more difference between the code generated by the tree-ssa
> compiler: it inlines fewer mem* functions. 
> 
Yes, because the estimate that relates number of trees to number
of RTL insns is wrong for GIMPLE.  Dan Berlin mentioned that he
wanted to increase it, I don't know if he ever got around to
doing it.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] decls in tree-ssa (fwd)
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]