This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: kgardas at objectsecurity dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, ras at objectsecurity dot com
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:58:25 -0600
Subject: Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0302101828450.482-100000@thinkpad.c0202001.roe.itnq.net><m3n0l4ui3m.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

>  the C++ runtime support that shipped with GCC-2.95.x (epecially the
>string implementation) is known not to work in multi-threading
>environment.  GCC-3.x is much much better (even if the front-end is
>slow).  

Dudes,

If I had a dime for every time this question was asked, even though it's
on the FAQ, or for every time some person tried to get 2.90.8 up on
gcc-2.x and failed, or for every time some huge MT app in some
impossible-to-reproduce, crazy hardware situation telecom/financial
testing lab failed due to v2 MT string issues but passed with v3......

... there would be free empanadas and bordeaux for everybody.

;)

-benjamin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
  - From: Karel Gardas
- Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
  - From: Karel Gardas
- Re: gcc 2.95.4 MT related crashes in basic_string class
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]