This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3


On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 06:53:51PM +0100, Geoff Keating wrote:
> Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de> writes:
> 
> > > One thing that is really important in going after speed improvements is
> > > to have really accurate profiling information that shows where the time
> > > is being spent. Otherwise you will chase phantoms.
> > 
> > My -O2 test case was spending 10% in the parser, according to the standard timing
> > output. This was in the top three, with only CSE being slower. This was on an
> > Athlon.
> 
> You should be aware that last time I looked, "parser" really meant
> "all the time that wasn't allocated to some other part of the compiler".

oprofile confirmed it - lots of hits in yyparse()

arguably that could be C code in the parser semantics too.

-Andi


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]