This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:31:23 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
References: <20030207222614.GB10075@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302081922520.29180-100000@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

> > > Mikulas Patocka wrote:-
> > >
> > > > No. BTW - I ripped some parts of my port from EMX GCC 2.7.2.1 (it is also
> > > > GPLed) -- does it mean that Eberhard Mattes needs copyright assignment
> > > > too?
> > >
> > > I have no idea as I know nothing about that compiler.
> > In any case, when some code has been cut&pasted from someones else work,
> > he needs assignment as well.  But I believe Mattes has it already as he
> > is working on EMX for some time already.
> 
> He never pushed his changes into main gcc distribution. I'll ask him, if
> he is going to sign it. If he won't sign it, I could go through the patch
> and attempt to rewrite parts from EMX, however I don't really know, how to
> rewrite a lot of one-line changes. Do small few-line changes matter?

There is exception for very small patches, but I am not sure whether
collection of many very small patches still has such exception.

Honza
> 
> Mikulas

References:
- Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: GCC 3.3 for OS/2
  - From: Mikulas Patocka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]