This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Installation instructions unclear regarding BINUTILS
- From: Paul Repacholi <prep at prep dot synonet dot com>
- To: gcc at gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 22:49:03 +0800
- Subject: Installation instructions unclear regarding BINUTILS
The install files are unclear as to how to untar or symlink
binutils.
gcc 3.2.1
binutils 2.13.2
> If you also intend to build binutils (either to upgrade an existing
> installation or for use in place of the corresponding tools of your
> OS), unpack the binutils distribution either in the same directory
> or a separate one. In the latter case, add symbolic links to any
> components of the binutils you intend to build alongside the
> compiler (bfd, binutils, gas, gprof, ld, opcodes, ...) to the
> directory containing the GCC sources.
First, the main gcc-<version> directory contains a directory gcc
that contains the sources to gcc. So is this a reference to
gcc-<version> or gcc-<version>/gcc?
Also, the first part of the instructions are either unclear, or
wrong. If after untaring you have ...foo/gcc-<version> and
...foo/binutil-<version>, running configure in the gcc tree does not
use the unpacked binutils as the install files imply. Are you meant
to untar binutils into the gcc-<version> directory?
--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.