Re: Implementing OpenMP pragmas for the C front end

[Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>]

Joseph S. Myers wrote:-

> On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Neil Booth wrote:
> 
> > I want to wait until I have something that actually parses most of C99.
> > Then it will be bug-fixing, doing the lowering stage, adding GNU
> > extensions and adding ObjC; which could be done in CVS.
> 
> Do you have a design document - describing how it is similar to the C++
> parser, how it differs, what existing code is reused, what is shared with
> C++, what is adapted to the new parser structure (and whether any such
> changes can be done incrementally), what is rewritten afresh (and
> rationale for these choices), what intentional behaviour changes there are
> (and whether these too can be done incrementally: if something becomes a
> hard error, emit a mandatory deprecation warning now for 3.3 if the
> information is now available in the present parser to do so), what new
> features (if any) are to be implemented at the same time as the parser 
> (and why at the same time rather than once the parser is in mainline 
> making them easier to implement), what (apart from OpenMP discussed here) 
> should be easier to implement once the new parser is in, ...?

Nope.

Neil.