This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Hi, On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > This patch is mostly fine, thanks! > > Could you please move the 3.2.2 announcement ahead of the Release History IMHO it's part of the release history, but I could imagine the _addition_ of a note like "The current release is 3.2.2" at the top. What about that? > and avoid skipping <h3>? (There never should be a jump like <h2> -> <h3> > as far as I know.) rxp validated it, and the Browsers I used rendered it fine. But indeed, level jumps could create nasty effects with automatic table-of-contents generation by some tools (html2ps perhaps). On the other hand <h3> just looked too big for a simple date. What about switching to a <dl> instead? Hm, looks really fine! I have attached the new patch. Sorry for again requesting an OK. Further changes (compared to the previous patch): * Renamed section "Additional Release Information" to "Refernces and Acknowledgements" to better match its content. * Set the 3.2.2 release date to Feb 5 (Gaby's announcement) instead of Feb 6 (today) * The history entry for GCC 3.2 links to the 3.2-specific changes section in `changes.html', not to the entire changes page, similar to the entries for 3.2.1 and 3.2.2. As a compensation, the top of the page references `changes.html' without anchor. Again verified using rxp for validation, plus text-mode and graphics-mode browsers. IMHO it looks even better now :-) Regards, Christian Cornelssen
Attachment:
gcc-3.2.2-index-2.diff
Description: Text document
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |