This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: email-based regression search server


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:54:38PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 01:57:23PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
[...]
> just a compiler, and I didn't preserve the drivers.  I can start doing
> so, but I've got 6GB of cc1* already.  And the driver wouldn't be enough;

6GB!  I wouldn't have expected that...

> > Could your setup be modified to accept a test case plus a script to run
> > it?  That script, like the one used by my regression search tools, could
> > return 1 meaning to search later dates or 0 meaning to search earlier
> > dates.
> 
> For the #1 script, certainly.  For the #2 script, no way in hell.  :-)
> 
> I realize it would be cool, but the thought of allowing anybody in the
> world to email an arbitrary script to my machine and have it automatically
> executed, just doesn't appeal to me.

It'd be doubly arbitrary code you'd be letting anyone run: presumably, GCC
*mostly* works.  IOW a 7eeT Xp10it could be *compiled*, even if a chroot'ed
environment were made "safe".

> Yes, I know I'm trying to keep the address nonpublished; someday it'll
> leak out.  I know that I can make the procmail recipe check for a list
> of valid users; email can be forged.  I can probably set up some kind of
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
pgp/gpg helps here.  I once had a script for myself when I'm out of the
office to do just this sort of thing: execute arbitrary scripts, but only
if someone trusted (should have been only I but it turned out anyone in my
keyring would also match - recipe disabled now) wrote it.  Mail me
privately if you want it.  (It even kinda worked.)

> chroot'd environment, but it would still bother me.  Doing this would,
> eventually, not be different than simply giving out universal shell access.

... shell access with a development environment.  :(

Bernd Jendrissek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE+QhSX/FmLrNfLpjMRAiY/AJ9lgEBsm0ACZKq0ISVSNs5HGVbVzwCfTIz6
bwRjvNOBjJ6qD/zPfnrp6ts=
=ulQa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]