gcc archive
date index for February, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 22, 2003

23:09 Re: Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice law

23:02 Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice Jan Hubicka

20:29 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY Josef Zlomek

19:25 Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY Geoff Keating

18:59 Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler? Jan Hubicka

17:45 'partial preprocessing' option request. Gareth Pearce

17:30 what is the use of your services. john mark

17:29 what is the use of your services. john mark

16:26 Re: unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf Richard Earnshaw

16:10 Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc) Matthias Klose

16:02 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c Kaveh R. Ghazi

15:41 Re: Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"? Jan Hubicka

15:35 Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3 Bernd Trog

15:05 Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg Neil Booth

15:03 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up Michael S . Zick

14:33 Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"? Steve Snyder

14:25 PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc) Kai Henningsen

14:11 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up) Michael S . Zick

13:10 Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode Richard Earnshaw

12:09 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c Richard Earnshaw

11:25 Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings Jan Hubicka

10:45 Garbage Collector interface - GTY Josef Zlomek

10:20 Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock? Jan Hubicka

09:03 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup) Gerald Pfeifer

09:01 Re: Solaris (Sparc and x86) status? Eric Botcazou

08:56 Re: Target-specific bugs Zack Weinberg

08:54 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup) Nathanael Nerode

08:30 Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup) Joseph S. Myers

07:13 Solaris (Sparc and x86) status? Nathanael Nerode

05:30 Re: Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828 Andreas Jaeger

05:13 Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up) Nathanael Nerode

03:22 Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c Kaveh R. Ghazi

02:51 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3 Mark Mitchell

01:51 Regarding CVS commit gcc/gcc ChangeLog ggc-page.c @ Feb 4, 2003 Gerard Beekmans

01:22 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3 Kaoru Fukui

01:17 Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828 Steven Bosscher

01:06 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question Geoff Keating

00:53 Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg Mark Mitchell

00:39 Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3 Kaveh R. Ghazi

00:30 Re: ISO Aliasing rules question Joseph S. Myers

00:26 Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up Jan Hubicka

00:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls law

23:48	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)	Ashif S. Harji
23:40	Re: gcc and include dirs	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
23:28	Re: Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403	Dan Kegel
23:26	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Richard Henderson
23:26	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Mike Stump
23:25	Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403	Dan Kegel
23:13	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:07	Re: gcc and include dirs -> use the C_INCLUDE_PATH var.	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
23:03	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Richard Henderson
21:56	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	snyder
21:40	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch	Michael Matz
21:15	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
21:01	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch	Karel Gardas
20:58	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
20:23	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Russ Allbery
19:54	Re: tree-ssa status	Toon Moene
19:53	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Toon Moene
19:35	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:33	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch	Mike Stump
19:27	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:22	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:19	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:03	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
18:47	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Mike Stump
18:25	Re: are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdb namespace work?	David Carlton
17:29	are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdbnamespace work?	Benjamin Kosnik
17:03	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Benjamin Kosnik
16:57	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
16:06	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
15:52	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
15:43	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
15:38	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
15:34	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:31	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
15:29	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:24	Re: unrecognizable insn help	Peter Barada
15:16	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
14:44	Re: Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash	Nick Clifton
14:25	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	law
14:21	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
14:16	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Joel Sherrill
14:00	C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression ongcc3.3 branch	Karel Gardas
13:25	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Berlin
13:15	Re: compile server design document	Fergus Henderson
13:09	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Robert Dewar
13:06	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
12:50	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andreas Schwab
10:55	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
10:46	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
10:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
10:29	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
10:16	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Richard Earnshaw
09:56	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Jan Hubicka
08:20	Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash	Kor Snyman
08:11	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
07:25	gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
06:29	Question on libgcc_eh	Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
05:54	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
05:21	GCC 3.4	Robert McNulty Junior
03:58	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:36	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
03:15	unrecognizable insn help	Tupshin Harper
01:38	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Kurt Wall
00:38	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
00:02	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner

23:50	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:46	Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	nabeel
23:36	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
23:09	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Matt Austern
23:04	Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Anna Fowles-Winkler
22:47	Re: tree-ssa status	law
22:27	Re: tree-ssa status	Zack Weinberg
22:11	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	law
21:45	Re: compile server design document	Devang Patel
21:36	Re: tree-ssa status	Steven Bosscher
21:32	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Andreas Tobler
21:27	Should contrib/test_summary work with joined gcc/binutils/gdb?	c . christian . joensson
21:23	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	DJ Delorie
21:23	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Jason Merrill
21:23	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Michael Matz
21:18	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Michael Matz
21:17	Re: tree-ssa status	Paul Brook
21:03	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
21:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
20:59	parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Andreas Tobler
20:57	Re: tree-ssa status	Zack Weinberg
20:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
20:55	Re: undocumented attributes	Joseph S. Myers
20:49	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
20:45	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
20:44	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
20:43	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
20:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Michael Matz
20:37	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Daniel Berlin
20:36	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Steven Bosscher
20:34	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Daniel Berlin
20:32	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
20:31	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Steven Bosscher
20:30	Re: undocumented attributes	Aldy Hernandez
20:15	Re: compile server design document	Joseph S. Myers
20:06	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
19:59	[tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew Haley
19:57	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
19:52	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
19:43	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
19:42	[tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
19:18	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
19:15	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
18:47	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
18:30	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
17:34	tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Steven Bosscher
17:23	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	David Carlton
17:13	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
17:07	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
16:59	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
16:55	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
16:39	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
16:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
16:32	My way to the fine art nude photography...	svetlana
16:23	Re: gcc in IA64	Vladimir Makarov
16:17	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Wolfgang Bangerth
16:15	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
16:07	Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails	Nick Clifton
16:06	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Peter Barada
16:03	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Richard Earnshaw
15:48	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
15:43	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
15:26	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Peter Barada
15:18	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
15:13	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
14:44	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Allan Sandfeld
14:25	ARM - register liveness problem	Vidacs Laszlo
14:10	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Gerhard Tonn
13:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:23	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Gerhard Tonn
11:47	Re: compile server design document	Steven Bosscher
11:28	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
11:22	Re: compile server design document	Jan Hubicka
10:51	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
10:49	Re: compile server design document	Joseph S. Myers
10:36	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Richard Earnshaw
10:14	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Olivier Galibert
08:22	undocumented attributes	Massimiliano Cialdi
07:27	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
07:08	gcc in IA64	Daniel Carrera
06:58	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
06:16	Re: compile server design document	Timothy J. Wood
06:13	help: real_convert aborts when targetting new cpu	Tupshin Harper
05:55	arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
04:24	Re: compile server design document	Tolga Dalman
04:07	compile server design document	Per Bothner
03:44	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
02:27	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
01:12	Re: patch that caused regression PR c++/9367	Jason R Thorpe
01:04	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
00:47	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
00:23	Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
00:14	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
00:12	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Joseph S. Myers
00:07	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
00:01	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
00:00	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner

23:59	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:44	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:41	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Joseph S. Myers
23:27	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
23:24	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Richard Stallman
23:23	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Zack Weinberg
23:10	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:04	'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:01	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
22:50	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
22:24	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Mike Stump
22:04	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
21:50	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mike Stump
21:50	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
21:48	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Andreas Schwab
21:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
21:38	My way to the fine art nude photography...	Svetlana
21:18	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
21:13	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
21:09	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Andreas Schwab
21:08	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Ashif S. Harji
20:44	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
20:37	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Matthew Wilcox
20:37	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Steven Bosscher
20:17	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Neil Booth
20:08	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Nathanael Nerode
20:01	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
19:49	Re: autoconf issues	James Dessart
19:47	Re: autoconf issues	Eric Botcazou
19:45	Re: autoconf issues	Zack Weinberg
19:24	Repository CDs (Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Michael S . Zick
19:01	autoconf issues	James Dessart
18:13	Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Jan Hubicka
18:00	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Jan Hubicka
17:46	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
17:29	Re: corrupted debug info?	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:14	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
17:06	corrupted debug info?	Andrea Galbusera
16:35	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Peter Barada
16:08	Words endian is different in registers than in memory	Andrew Haley
16:06	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
15:55	Words endian is different in registers than in memory	Anders Ådland
15:47	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
14:57	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
14:50	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:27	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
13:58	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
13:44	Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails	Richard Earnshaw
11:53	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:47	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
11:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:38	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
11:05	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mattias Engdeg�rd
10:51	xscale arm build bootstrap fails	jeroen dobbelaere
10:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:18	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
10:11	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
10:10	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
09:52	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Andi Kleen
09:40	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Olivier Galibert
09:39	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Tim Josling
07:17	Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
06:31	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
05:13	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Mark Mitchell
04:41	Re: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:29	Re: limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.	Jim Wilson
04:10	Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:39	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:34	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:33	Re: additions to GCC 3.2 build status list	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:26	re: hmm	Rich Persaud
03:14	Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Kumar Gala
03:13	4-in-1 Multiple-Function digital camera offer	william
03:05	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
03:04	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
02:42	hmm	Tom Lord
02:38	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
01:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
00:23	Re: problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)	Richard Henderson
00:11	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:06	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:01	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Alan Modra

23:55	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Henderson
23:45	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	law
23:43	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Henderson
23:43	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Dale Johannesen
23:20	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
23:09	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Neil Booth
23:05	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Richard Henderson
23:01	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
22:58	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
22:35	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
22:33	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Michel LESPINASSE
22:22	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
22:20	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
22:07	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Christoph Hellwig
22:05	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:01	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Stuart Hastings
21:49	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Graham Stott
21:48	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	tm_gccmail
21:22	additions to GCC 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
21:09	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
20:59	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Timothy J. Wood
20:58	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
20:57	Gcc 3.2.2 Build	Diego Rodrigo
20:51	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Michael Hayes
20:47	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
20:44	patches that affect regression PR c++/9820	Janis Johnson
20:36	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Michel LESPINASSE
20:26	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Aaron Lehmann
20:22	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
20:19	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Ashif S. Harji
19:58	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
19:51	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Andi Kleen
19:45	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Aaron Lehmann
19:41	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Tolga Dalman
19:32	Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Tim Josling
19:31	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
19:28	Re: Bugzilla	Robert Dewar
19:25	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	tm_gccmail
19:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
19:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
19:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
19:11	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
19:01	limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.	Evgenij Portnov
18:48	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
18:45	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Richard Henderson
18:40	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Joseph S. Myers
18:37	Re: Bugzilla	Joseph S. Myers
18:34	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
18:33	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:30	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Phil Edwards
18:25	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Joel Sherrill
18:22	Re: Bugzilla	Zack Weinberg
18:22	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
18:21	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:20	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
18:17	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
18:16	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:14	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
18:14	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nathanael Nerode
18:01	Re: PR 8805: EH vs. CFG	Richard Henderson
18:01	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Janis Johnson
17:59	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
17:59	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:54	mainline bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu	Brad Lucier
17:51	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
17:48	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Phil Edwards
17:45	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
17:43	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
17:28	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
17:24	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:23	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:11	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
17:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matthias Klose
16:59	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
16:57	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:57	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
16:56	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Chris Lattner
16:51	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:47	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:31	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:24	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:23	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:20	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:18	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:16	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:12	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:07	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:07	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:00	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:50	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:49	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
15:42	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
15:37	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:36	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Fergus Henderson
15:35	Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?	Paolo Bonzini
15:33	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
15:28	[tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:28	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Ralf Corsepius
14:57	master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:45	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
14:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
14:17	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Paolo Bonzini
14:04	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:53	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
13:51	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
13:12	problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)	Andy Parker
12:58	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andreas Schwab
12:44	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
12:36	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:31	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
12:30	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:25	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
12:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
12:10	Re: Bugzilla	Robert Dewar
11:55	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Franz Sirl
11:45	RE: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kean Johnston
11:32	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Lars Segerlund
11:30	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Jan Hubicka
11:18	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
10:57	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Ralf Corsepius
10:50	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
10:48	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Steven Bosscher
10:34	All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
10:26	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Richard Earnshaw
10:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
09:15	Re: Bugzilla	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:00	Re: Bugzilla	Nathanael Nerode
08:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nathanael Nerode
08:31	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Eric Botcazou
08:31	Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
08:09	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
07:07	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Steven Bosscher
06:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Steven Bosscher
06:43	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matthias Klose
03:26	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Tolga Dalman
03:20	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Tolga Dalman
03:06	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Fergus Henderson
02:57	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Fergus Henderson
02:49	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Jason R Thorpe
02:40	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mark Mitchell
02:39	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mark Mitchell
02:34	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Zack Weinberg
02:20	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
02:06	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:44	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Dirk Mueller
00:54	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
00:51	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
00:32	Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
00:29	Bug in real.c rewrite	law
00:09	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andi Kleen

23:56	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:40	[Fwd: Re: Target deprecation, round three]	Mark Mitchell
23:29	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Steven Bosscher
23:17	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
23:15	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Toon Moene
23:13	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Jim Wilson
23:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
23:08	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Joseph S. Myers
23:07	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Mike Stump
23:03	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
22:55	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:47	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Mark Mitchell
22:40	Re: IA64 simulator and board description?	Jim Wilson
21:58	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Andreas Schwab
21:50	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nick Burrett
21:49	*Re: arc--* was Re: Target deprecation, round three**	Richard Kenner
21:47	*Re: arc--* was Re: Target deprecation, round three**	Richard Kenner
21:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Franz Sirl
21:41	Re: HAVE_probe macro	Zack Weinberg
21:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
21:30	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Jason R Thorpe
21:23	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	law
21:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Franz Sirl
21:04	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
21:00	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
20:52	Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
20:47	Re: Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?	Peter Barada
20:44	successfully built/installed gcc-3.2.2 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.1	Jonathan Thornburg
20:37	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:33	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
20:32	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Jakub Jelinek
20:28	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andi Kleen
20:26	answered my own question (in part)	Dave . Salgueiro
20:21	Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?	Dave . Salgueiro
20:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Dan Kegel
20:11	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Steven Bosscher
20:04	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:02	internal error in cp-lang.c	Karol Szkudlarek
20:02	Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Kai Henningsen
19:56	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
19:49	gcc make error	Mike Cleary
19:36	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:57	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
18:44	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
18:27	Re: Target deprecation, round three	DJ Delorie
18:10	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:48	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
17:47	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:46	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:32	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:32	*Re: arc--* was Re: Target deprecation, round three**	Joel Sherrill
17:20	*Re: arc--* was Re: Target deprecation, round three**	Zack Weinberg
17:18	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:15	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:12	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Jan Hubicka
17:08	gcc-ss-20030224 is now available	gccadmin
17:01	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Steven Bosscher
16:48	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Andreas Jaeger
16:48	patch that caused regression PR c++/9676	Janis Johnson
16:47	patch that caused regression PR inline-asm/9570	Janis Johnson
16:46	patch that caused regression PR c++/9367	Janis Johnson
16:45	patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Janis Johnson
16:17	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
16:14	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Andreas Jaeger
16:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
15:10	Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Herbert Schmid
14:49	*arc--* was Re: Target deprecation, round three**	Joel Sherrill
14:47	Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Andreas Jaeger
14:42	RE: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Gyurki, Istvan (MED)
14:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:21	Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Jiang Alan
14:19	Re: H8300-elf Cross compiler	Kazu Hirata
13:02	Re: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Fergus Henderson
12:55	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-23	Diego Novillo
12:43	objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Gyurki, Istvan (MED)
12:21	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Marco Morandini
12:09	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:53	Successfully built: gcc-3.2.2	Helmut Schlattl
11:16	H8300-elf Cross compiler	D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
10:44	Crosscompiler	Leonardo
10:13	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Jakob Engblom
07:41	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:41	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:39	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:35	Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Mark Mitchell
07:21	PR 8805: EH vs. CFG	Mark Mitchell
06:58	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
06:54	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Steven Bosscher
05:47	Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
05:18	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Andrew Pinski
05:06	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Justin Hibbits
04:14	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
02:48	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Dewar
02:47	Re: Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release?	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Myers
01:00	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Myers
00:34	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Dewar
00:30	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Robert Dewar

23:09	Re: Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice	law
23:02	Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice	Jan Hubicka
20:29	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Josef Zlomek
19:25	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Geoff Keating
18:59	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Jan Hubicka
17:45	'partial preprocessing' option request.	Gareth Pearce
17:30	what is the use of your services.	john mark
17:29	what is the use of your services.	john mark
16:26	Re: unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf	Richard Earnshaw
16:10	Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Matthias Klose
16:02	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:41	Re: Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?	Jan Hubicka
15:35	Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3	Bernd Trog
15:05	Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Neil Booth
15:03	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
14:33	Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?	Steve Snyder
14:25	PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Kai Henningsen
14:11	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Michael S . Zick
13:10	Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode	Richard Earnshaw
12:09	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Richard Earnshaw
11:25	Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	Jan Hubicka
10:45	Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Josef Zlomek
10:20	Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Jan Hubicka
09:03	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Gerald Pfeifer
09:01	Re: Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?	Eric Botcazou
08:56	Re: Target-specific bugs	Zack Weinberg
08:54	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Nathanael Nerode
08:30	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Joseph S. Myers
07:13	Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?	Nathanael Nerode
05:30	Re: Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828	Andreas Jaeger
05:13	Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Nathanael Nerode
03:22	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:51	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mark Mitchell
01:51	Regarding CVS commit gcc/gcc ChangeLog ggc-page.c @ Feb 4, 2003	Gerard Beekmans
01:22	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
01:17	Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828	Steven Bosscher
01:06	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Geoff Keating
00:53	Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Mark Mitchell
00:39	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:30	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Joseph S. Myers
00:26	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Jan Hubicka
00:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls	law

gcc archivedate index for February, 2003

gcc archive
date index for February, 2003