gcc archive
date index for February, 2003

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

February 28, 2003

23:48	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag (patches for gcc3.3)	Ashif S. Harji
23:40	Re: gcc and include dirs	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
23:28	Re: Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403	Dan Kegel
23:26	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Richard Henderson
23:26	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Mike Stump
23:25	Internal compiler error in gcc3.0.2 for ppc403	Dan Kegel
23:13	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:07	Re: gcc and include dirs -> use the C_INCLUDE_PATH var.	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
23:03	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Richard Henderson
21:56	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	snyder
21:40	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch	Michael Matz
21:15	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
21:01	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regressionon gcc3.3 branch	Karel Gardas
20:58	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
20:23	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Russ Allbery
19:54	Re: tree-ssa status	Toon Moene
19:53	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Toon Moene
19:35	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:33	Re: C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression on gcc3.3 branch	Mike Stump
19:27	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:22	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:19	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Devang Patel
19:03	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
18:47	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Mike Stump
18:25	Re: are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdb namespace work?	David Carlton
17:29	are there outstanding patches on the compiler side for gdbnamespace work?	Benjamin Kosnik
17:03	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Benjamin Kosnik
16:57	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
16:06	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
15:52	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
15:43	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
15:38	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
15:34	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:31	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
15:29	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:24	Re: unrecognizable insn help	Peter Barada
15:16	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
14:44	Re: Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash	Nick Clifton
14:25	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	law
14:21	Re: gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Michael S . Zick
14:16	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Joel Sherrill
14:00	C++ optimization: compile time + memory consumption regression ongcc3.3 branch	Karel Gardas
13:25	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Berlin
13:15	Re: compile server design document	Fergus Henderson
13:09	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Robert Dewar
13:06	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
12:50	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andreas Schwab
10:55	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
10:46	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
10:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
10:29	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
10:16	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Richard Earnshaw
09:56	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Jan Hubicka
08:20	Subject: GNU ARM cross compiler failing to call code in ram from flash	Kor Snyman
08:11	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Andi Kleen
07:25	gcc and include dirs -> do we need a /etc/includes.conf?	Gerold J. Wucherpfennig
06:29	Question on libgcc_eh	Takis Psarogiannakopoulos
05:54	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
05:21	GCC 3.4	Robert McNulty Junior
03:58	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:36	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Jim Wilson
03:15	unrecognizable insn help	Tupshin Harper
01:38	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Kurt Wall
00:38	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
00:02	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner

February 27, 2003

23:50	Re: Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:46	Huge Increase in Unstripped Executable Size G++ 2.95 to 3.2	nabeel
23:36	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
23:09	Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Matt Austern
23:04	Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed?	Anna Fowles-Winkler
22:47	Re: tree-ssa status	law
22:27	Re: tree-ssa status	Zack Weinberg
22:11	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	law
21:45	Re: compile server design document	Devang Patel
21:36	Re: tree-ssa status	Steven Bosscher
21:32	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Andreas Tobler
21:27	Should contrib/test_summary work with joined gcc/binutils/gdb?	c . christian . joensson
21:23	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	DJ Delorie
21:23	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Jason Merrill
21:23	Re: parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Michael Matz
21:18	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Michael Matz
21:17	Re: tree-ssa status	Paul Brook
21:03	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
21:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
20:59	parallel make, do we have a FAQ ?	Andreas Tobler
20:57	Re: tree-ssa status	Zack Weinberg
20:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
20:55	Re: undocumented attributes	Joseph S. Myers
20:49	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
20:45	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
20:44	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
20:43	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
20:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Michael Matz
20:37	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Daniel Berlin
20:36	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Steven Bosscher
20:34	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Daniel Berlin
20:32	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
20:31	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Steven Bosscher
20:30	Re: undocumented attributes	Aldy Hernandez
20:15	Re: compile server design document	Joseph S. Myers
20:06	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
19:59	[tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew Haley
19:57	Re: [tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	Andrew MacLeod
19:52	Re: tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Diego Novillo
19:43	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
19:42	[tree-ssa] Inlining vs gimple vs compound expressions	law
19:18	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
19:15	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
18:47	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
18:30	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
17:34	tree-ssa status (was: Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer)	Steven Bosscher
17:23	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	David Carlton
17:13	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
17:07	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
16:59	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
16:55	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
16:39	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
16:39	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
16:32	My way to the fine art nude photography...	svetlana
16:23	Re: gcc in IA64	Vladimir Makarov
16:17	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Wolfgang Bangerth
16:15	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
16:07	Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails	Nick Clifton
16:06	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Peter Barada
16:03	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Richard Earnshaw
15:48	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
15:43	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Daniel Berlin
15:26	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Peter Barada
15:18	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Pop Sébastian
15:13	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
14:44	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Allan Sandfeld
14:25	ARM - register liveness problem	Vidacs Laszlo
14:10	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Gerhard Tonn
13:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:23	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Gerhard Tonn
11:47	Re: compile server design document	Steven Bosscher
11:28	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
11:22	Re: compile server design document	Jan Hubicka
10:51	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
10:49	Re: compile server design document	Joseph S. Myers
10:36	Re: arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Richard Earnshaw
10:14	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Olivier Galibert
08:22	undocumented attributes	Massimiliano Cialdi
07:27	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
07:08	gcc in IA64	Daniel Carrera
06:58	Re: compile server design document	Per Bothner
06:16	Re: compile server design document	Timothy J. Wood
06:13	help: real_convert aborts when targetting new cpu	Tupshin Harper
05:55	arm-elf MULTILIBS_DEFAULT	Ralf Corsepius
04:24	Re: compile server design document	Tolga Dalman
04:07	compile server design document	Per Bothner
03:44	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
02:27	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
01:12	Re: patch that caused regression PR c++/9367	Jason R Thorpe
01:04	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
00:47	Re: Dropping of old loop optimizer	tm_gccmail
00:23	Dropping of old loop optimizer	Zdenek Dvorak
00:14	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
00:12	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Joseph S. Myers
00:07	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
00:01	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
00:00	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner

February 26, 2003

23:59	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:44	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:41	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Joseph S. Myers
23:27	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
23:24	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Richard Stallman
23:23	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Zack Weinberg
23:10	Re: 'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:04	'malloc' attribute?	Chris Lattner
23:01	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
22:50	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
22:24	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Mike Stump
22:04	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
21:50	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mike Stump
21:50	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
21:48	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Andreas Schwab
21:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
21:38	My way to the fine art nude photography...	Svetlana
21:18	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
21:13	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	John David Anglin
21:09	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Andreas Schwab
21:08	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Ashif S. Harji
20:44	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
20:37	Re: [parisc-linux] 2.4.20-pa27 64bits smp problem!	Matthew Wilcox
20:37	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Steven Bosscher
20:17	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Neil Booth
20:08	Re: Please test bugzilla web interface	Nathanael Nerode
20:01	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
19:49	Re: autoconf issues	James Dessart
19:47	Re: autoconf issues	Eric Botcazou
19:45	Re: autoconf issues	Zack Weinberg
19:24	Repository CDs (Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Michael S . Zick
19:01	autoconf issues	James Dessart
18:13	Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Jan Hubicka
18:00	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Jan Hubicka
17:46	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
17:29	Re: corrupted debug info?	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:14	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
17:06	corrupted debug info?	Andrea Galbusera
16:35	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Peter Barada
16:08	Words endian is different in registers than in memory	Andrew Haley
16:06	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
15:55	Words endian is different in registers than in memory	Anders Ådland
15:47	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
14:57	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
14:50	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:27	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Joel Sherrill
13:58	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
13:44	Re: xscale arm build bootstrap fails	Richard Earnshaw
11:53	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:47	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
11:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:38	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
11:05	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mattias Engdegård
10:51	xscale arm build bootstrap fails	jeroen dobbelaere
10:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:18	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
10:11	RE: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
10:10	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
09:52	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Andi Kleen
09:40	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Olivier Galibert
09:39	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Tim Josling
07:17	Please test bugzilla web interface	Daniel Berlin
06:31	Re: failuer to build uberbaum --target=m68k-elf	Jim Wilson
05:13	Re: Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Mark Mitchell
04:41	Re: Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:29	Re: limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.	Jim Wilson
04:10	Bootstrap broken by recent fixincl change	Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:39	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:34	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:33	Re: additions to GCC 3.2 build status list	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:26	re: hmm	Rich Persaud
03:14	Who to query about copyright assignment practices?	Kumar Gala
03:13	4-in-1 Multiple-Function digital camera offer	william
03:05	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
03:04	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
02:42	hmm	Tom Lord
02:38	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
01:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
00:23	Re: problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)	Richard Henderson
00:11	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:06	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Henderson
00:01	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Alan Modra

February 25, 2003

23:55	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Henderson
23:45	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	law
23:43	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Henderson
23:43	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Dale Johannesen
23:20	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
23:09	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Neil Booth
23:05	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Richard Henderson
23:01	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
22:58	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
22:35	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
22:33	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Michel LESPINASSE
22:22	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
22:20	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
22:07	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Christoph Hellwig
22:05	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:01	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Stuart Hastings
21:49	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Graham Stott
21:48	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	tm_gccmail
21:22	additions to GCC 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
21:09	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
20:59	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Timothy J. Wood
20:58	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matt Austern
20:57	Gcc 3.2.2 Build	Diego Rodrigo
20:51	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Michael Hayes
20:47	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
20:44	patches that affect regression PR c++/9820	Janis Johnson
20:36	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Michel LESPINASSE
20:26	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Aaron Lehmann
20:22	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
20:19	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Ashif S. Harji
19:58	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
19:51	Re: Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Andi Kleen
19:45	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Aaron Lehmann
19:41	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Tolga Dalman
19:32	Breaking up the 'parse' time into 'parse/bison' and 'parse/other'	Tim Josling
19:31	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
19:28	Re: Bugzilla	Robert Dewar
19:25	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	tm_gccmail
19:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
19:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
19:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
19:11	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
19:01	limit number of errors/warnings for gcc before it gives up.	Evgenij Portnov
18:48	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
18:45	Re: Bug in real.c rewrite	Richard Henderson
18:40	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Joseph S. Myers
18:37	Re: Bugzilla	Joseph S. Myers
18:34	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
18:33	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:30	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Phil Edwards
18:25	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Joel Sherrill
18:22	Re: Bugzilla	Zack Weinberg
18:22	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
18:21	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:20	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
18:17	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
18:16	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
18:14	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
18:14	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nathanael Nerode
18:01	Re: PR 8805: EH vs. CFG	Richard Henderson
18:01	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Janis Johnson
17:59	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
17:59	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:54	mainline bootstrap failure on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu	Brad Lucier
17:51	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
17:48	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Phil Edwards
17:45	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
17:43	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
17:28	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
17:24	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:23	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
17:11	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
17:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matthias Klose
16:59	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
16:57	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:57	Re: Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Michael Matz
16:56	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Chris Lattner
16:51	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:47	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:31	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:24	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:23	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:20	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:18	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:16	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:12	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
16:07	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
16:07	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:00	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:50	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:49	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
15:42	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	law
15:37	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:36	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Fergus Henderson
15:35	Re: master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?	Paolo Bonzini
15:33	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
15:28	[tree-ssa] CCP and non-destructive folding problems	Diego Novillo
15:28	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Ralf Corsepius
14:57	master copy of ltcf-c.sh, ltcf-gcj.sh, ltmain.sh?	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:45	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
14:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
14:17	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Paolo Bonzini
14:04	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:53	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
13:51	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
13:12	problems relocating code and rodata sections (gcc 3.2 / arm)	Andy Parker
12:58	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andreas Schwab
12:44	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
12:36	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:31	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
12:30	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:25	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Robert Dewar
12:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
12:10	Re: Bugzilla	Robert Dewar
11:55	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Franz Sirl
11:45	RE: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kean Johnston
11:32	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Lars Segerlund
11:30	Re: All ARM compiler builds failing	Jan Hubicka
11:18	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
10:57	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Ralf Corsepius
10:50	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
10:48	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Steven Bosscher
10:34	All ARM compiler builds failing	Richard Earnshaw
10:26	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Richard Earnshaw
10:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Richard Earnshaw
09:15	Re: Bugzilla	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:00	Re: Bugzilla	Nathanael Nerode
08:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nathanael Nerode
08:31	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Eric Botcazou
08:31	Bug in ra-colorize.c:merge_moves?	Christian Ehrhardt
08:09	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Andi Kleen
07:07	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Steven Bosscher
06:45	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Steven Bosscher
06:43	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Matthias Klose
03:26	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Tolga Dalman
03:20	Re: Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Tolga Dalman
03:06	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Fergus Henderson
02:57	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Fergus Henderson
02:49	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Jason R Thorpe
02:40	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mark Mitchell
02:39	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Mark Mitchell
02:34	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Zack Weinberg
02:20	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
02:06	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:44	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Dirk Mueller
00:54	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Mike Stump
00:51	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
00:32	Inlining (was: GCC 3.3 release criteria)	Matt Austern
00:29	Bug in real.c rewrite	law
00:09	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andi Kleen

February 24, 2003

23:56	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:40	[Fwd: Re: Target deprecation, round three]	Mark Mitchell
23:29	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:23	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Steven Bosscher
23:17	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
23:15	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Toon Moene
23:13	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Jim Wilson
23:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
23:08	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Joseph S. Myers
23:07	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Mike Stump
23:03	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
22:55	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Daniel Jacobowitz
22:47	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Mark Mitchell
22:40	Re: IA64 simulator and board description?	Jim Wilson
21:58	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Andreas Schwab
21:50	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Nick Burrett
21:49	Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Kenner
21:47	Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three	Richard Kenner
21:42	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Franz Sirl
21:41	Re: HAVE_probe macro	Zack Weinberg
21:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
21:30	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Jason R Thorpe
21:23	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	law
21:14	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Franz Sirl
21:04	Re: Meta-expectations when testing	Janis Johnson
21:00	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
20:52	Meta-expectations when testing	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
20:47	Re: Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?	Peter Barada
20:44	successfully built/installed gcc-3.2.2 on i386-unknown-openbsd3.1	Jonathan Thornburg
20:37	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:33	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Janis Johnson
20:32	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Jakub Jelinek
20:28	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Andi Kleen
20:26	answered my own question (in part)	Dave . Salgueiro
20:21	Does any version of the GCC support the Motorola MC68EC000 core ?	Dave . Salgueiro
20:13	Re: GCC 3.3 release criteria	Dan Kegel
20:11	Re: internal error in cp-lang.c	Steven Bosscher
20:04	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:02	internal error in cp-lang.c	Karol Szkudlarek
20:02	Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Kai Henningsen
19:56	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
19:49	gcc make error	Mike Cleary
19:36	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:57	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
18:44	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
18:27	Re: Target deprecation, round three	DJ Delorie
18:10	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:48	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
17:47	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:46	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:32	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:32	Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
17:20	Re: arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:18	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:15	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
17:12	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Jan Hubicka
17:08	gcc-ss-20030224 is now available	gccadmin
17:01	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Steven Bosscher
16:48	Re: patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Andreas Jaeger
16:48	patch that caused regression PR c++/9676	Janis Johnson
16:47	patch that caused regression PR inline-asm/9570	Janis Johnson
16:46	patch that caused regression PR c++/9367	Janis Johnson
16:45	patch that caused regression PR opt/9357	Janis Johnson
16:17	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
16:14	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Andreas Jaeger
16:13	Re: Target deprecation, round three	David Edelsohn
15:10	Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Herbert Schmid
14:49	arc-*-* was Re: Target deprecation, round three	Joel Sherrill
14:47	Re: Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Andreas Jaeger
14:42	RE: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Gyurki, Istvan (MED)
14:37	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:21	Where is the built-in functions for SSE2 ?	Jiang Alan
14:19	Re: H8300-elf Cross compiler	Kazu Hirata
13:02	Re: objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Fergus Henderson
12:55	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2003-02-23	Diego Novillo
12:43	objcopy copies not only symbols asked?	Gyurki, Istvan (MED)
12:21	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Marco Morandini
12:09	Re: Target deprecation, round three	Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:53	Successfully built: gcc-3.2.2	Helmut Schlattl
11:16	H8300-elf Cross compiler	D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
10:44	Crosscompiler	Leonardo
10:13	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Jakob Engblom
07:41	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:41	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:39	Hello gcc !	gcc
07:35	Re: Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Mark Mitchell
07:21	PR 8805: EH vs. CFG	Mark Mitchell
06:58	Re: -no-integrated-cpp flag	Neil Booth
06:54	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Steven Bosscher
05:47	Target deprecation, round three	Zack Weinberg
05:18	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Andrew Pinski
05:06	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Justin Hibbits
04:14	Re: Bugzilla	Daniel Berlin
02:48	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Dewar
02:47	Re: Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release?	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Myers
01:00	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Myers
00:34	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Dewar
00:30	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Robert Dewar

February 23, 2003

23:59	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Zack Weinberg
23:54	GCC 3.3 release criteria	Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:54	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Gerard Beekmans
23:44	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Zack Weinberg
23:28	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Gerard Beekmans
23:00	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:15	Bugzilla	Nathanael Nerode
22:06	Chances of gcc 3.2.3 release?	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
21:50	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Erik Trulsson
21:24	Re: _Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Marcel Cox
21:01	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Nathanael Nerode
20:50	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Joel Sherrill
20:22	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Karel Gardas
20:18	_Complex and _Imaginary datatypes	Justin Hibbits
20:03	HAVE_probe macro	Larin Hennessy
19:47	Re: disable subregs?	Tupshin Harper
19:26	Bugzilla user/group permissions	Daniel Berlin
17:11	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Marc Espie
16:54	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Gerard Beekmans
16:35	Re: disable subregs?	Jan Hubicka
16:21	Re: gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:06	disable subregs?	Tupshin Harper
12:02	maillist	My List
11:00	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Jan Hubicka
10:04	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Josef Zlomek
09:16	Re: Feedback-driven optimization	Richard Henderson
08:35	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Chester R. Hosey
07:04	Feedback-driven optimization	Robert Myers
04:37	very strange problem on darwin6.4 with gcc-3.4	Brad Lucier
03:00	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Nix
02:23	Please test the gcc bugzilla interface	Daniel Berlin
02:06	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Daniel Berlin
01:33	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Geoff Keating
00:29	gcc3.3 30% speedup in the past 2 weeks (MICO compilation)	Karel Gardas

February 22, 2003

23:09	Re: Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice	law
23:02	Why is delete_null_pointer_checks called twice	Jan Hubicka
20:29	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Josef Zlomek
19:25	Re: Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Geoff Keating
18:59	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Jan Hubicka
17:45	'partial preprocessing' option request.	Gareth Pearce
17:30	what is the use of your services.	john mark
17:29	what is the use of your services.	john mark
16:26	Re: unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf	Richard Earnshaw
16:10	Re: PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Matthias Klose
16:02	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:41	Re: Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?	Jan Hubicka
15:35	Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3	Bernd Trog
15:05	Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Neil Booth
15:03	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael S . Zick
14:33	Difference between "-march=k6-3" and "-march=k6-2"?	Steve Snyder
14:25	PING: Patch: mainline bootstrap failure (libobjc)	Kai Henningsen
14:11	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Michael S . Zick
13:10	Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode	Richard Earnshaw
12:09	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Richard Earnshaw
11:25	Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	Jan Hubicka
10:45	Garbage Collector interface - GTY	Josef Zlomek
10:20	Destrictiveness of expansion and tree inlining deadlock?	Jan Hubicka
09:03	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Gerald Pfeifer
09:01	Re: Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?	Eric Botcazou
08:56	Re: Target-specific bugs	Zack Weinberg
08:54	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Nathanael Nerode
08:30	Re: Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs goingup)	Joseph S. Myers
07:13	Solaris (Sparc and x86) status?	Nathanael Nerode
05:30	Re: Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828	Andreas Jaeger
05:13	Target-specific bugs (was Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up)	Nathanael Nerode
03:22	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:51	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mark Mitchell
01:51	Regarding CVS commit gcc/gcc ChangeLog ggc-page.c @ Feb 4, 2003	Gerard Beekmans
01:22	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
01:17	Pending patches for PRs 3782 and 8828	Steven Bosscher
01:06	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Geoff Keating
00:53	Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Mark Mitchell
00:39	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:30	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Joseph S. Myers
00:26	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Jan Hubicka
00:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls	law

February 21, 2003

23:50	Re: SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Zack Weinberg
23:03	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Jan Hubicka
23:03	SC gives Global Write Privileges to Zack Weinberg	Mark Mitchell
23:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls	Jason Merrill
22:28	Re: Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3	Richard Henderson
21:50	Re: howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)]	Jan Hubicka
21:36	Re: howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)]	Jan Hubicka
21:29	howto debug ICE? [was: Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch(todays sources)]	Karel Gardas
21:26	Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)	Phil Edwards
21:10	Unfounded warnings in gcc-3.3	Bernd Trog
20:30	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Mark Mitchell
20:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls	Joe Buck
20:29	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Joel Sherrill
20:22	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kelley Cook
20:20	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Michael Matz
20:17	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Toon Moene
20:10	Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	Jan Hubicka
20:03	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Mark Mitchell
20:01	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Michael Matz
19:58	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Mark Mitchell
19:38	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Michael Matz
19:38	RE: gcc for ARM in thumb mode	Dave Murphy
19:33	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	law
19:16	Bootstrap failure with todays 3.3 CVS on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu	John David Anglin
19:16	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Michael Matz
19:13	Re: ISO Aliasing rules question	Mark Mitchell
19:00	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael Matz
18:57	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
18:57	Re: [3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi	Matthias Klose
18:53	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Michael Matz
18:36	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
18:36	Re: [3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi	Jakub Jelinek
18:31	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
18:31	[3.2 branch] alpha-linux bootstrap error building libffi	Matthias Klose
18:21	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Joel Sherrill
18:20	Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	David Edelsohn
18:11	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Krzysztof Parzyszek
18:02	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
17:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Gerald Pfeifer
17:57	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
17:55	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Robert Dewar
17:45	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Janis Johnson
17:41	Re: unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	David Edelsohn
17:40	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Krzysztof Parzyszek
17:40	Re: boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)	Andreas Tobler
17:27	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Andreas Tobler
17:25	Official Announcement: GCC Developer's Summit (2003)	Andrew J. Hutton
17:18	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Richard Earnshaw
17:15	unit-at-a-time build failure on arm-elf	Richard Earnshaw
17:12	ISO Aliasing rules question	law
17:04	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Andreas Tobler
17:00	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:59	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:48	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:45	[tree-ssa] Multiple simplification calls	law
16:40	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Olivier Galibert
16:12	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Krzysztof Parzyszek
16:11	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Andreas Tobler
16:08	Re: Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Wolfgang Bangerth
15:53	unit-at-a-time option causes incorrect line numbers in warnings	Joern Rennecke
15:33	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Karel Gardas
15:33	Re: Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Andrew Pinski
15:30	Build failure on x86	Tom Tromey
15:13	boostrap failure (ICE) on gcc-3_3-branch (todays sources)	Karel Gardas
14:29	Call for testers: libiberty/physmem.c	Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:47	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:20	Number of 3.3 hi-pri PRs going up	Steven Bosscher
11:15	Email Confirmation	ATS Stat Consulting Group
09:13	Re: 3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86	Jochen Kmietsch
09:09	IA64 simulator and board description?	Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
08:37	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:28	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:54	Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Allen Gwinn
02:45	Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Allen Gwinn
02:37	Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Allen Gwinn
02:01	Re: Static chains and pointers to functions	Janis Johnson
01:45	Re: Static chains and pointers to functions	Michael Matz
01:21	Re: Static chains and pointers to functions	Fergus Henderson
00:46	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi

February 20, 2003

23:35	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mike Stump
23:33	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Zack Weinberg
23:22	Re: Bugzilla?	Daniel Berlin
22:50	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mark Mitchell
22:48	Re: 3.3 target date?	Mark Mitchell
22:44	Re: 3.3 target date?	Dan Kegel
22:42	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mike Stump
22:41	Re: information about gcc compiler	Dan Kegel
22:40	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Kai Henningsen
22:20	gcc-3.2.2 on hpux10.20	Michael Vrencur
21:18	Re: what binutils for m68hc11-elf and gcc 3.3-branch	Stephane Carrez
21:18	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Mark Mitchell
21:16	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
21:15	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
20:43	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mark Mitchell
20:38	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
20:32	Bugzilla?	Neil Booth
20:20	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
20:17	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Mark Mitchell
20:17	Re: To const or not to const...	Joseph S. Myers
20:09	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
20:09	Static chains and pointers to functions	John Lu
19:52	Re: 3.2.2 successfully built :)	Eric Botcazou
19:32	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mark Mitchell
18:42	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
18:27	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Daniel Jacobowitz
18:27	3.2.2 successfully built :)	Ozzy
18:18	Re: Broken compiler suite	Fergus Henderson
18:12	Re: To const or not to const...	Jan-Benedict Glaw
18:11	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law
18:00	Re: 3.3 target date?	Mark Mitchell
17:57	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Phil Edwards
17:57	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Jack Lloyd
17:27	Re: To const or not to const...	Nathan Sidwell
17:26	Re: gcj + jakarta-tomcat-4	Tom Tromey
16:52	Need a C++ expert: libstdc++/9756	Phil Edwards
16:51	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Mongryong
16:50	Broken compiler suite	Dominic Amann
16:24	gcc on solaris	Mehdi Khaldi
16:21	gcj + jakarta-tomcat-4	Yajima, Yoshiko
15:24	Re: To const or not to const...	Jan-Benedict Glaw
14:27	Re: To const or not to const...	Christian Ehrhardt
14:14	Re: Breaking up enormous source files	Ansgar Esztermann
14:02	To const or not to const...	Jan-Benedict Glaw
13:57	what binutils for m68hc11-elf and gcc 3.3-branch	Joel Sherrill
13:55	Re: Breaking up enormous source files	Fergus Henderson
13:32	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Craig Rodrigues
13:22	Re: Breaking up enormous source files	Steven Bosscher
13:09	Breaking up enormous source files	Ansgar Esztermann
12:56	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:45	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Loic Dachary
12:28	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Paolo Bonzini
12:21	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Paolo Bonzini
12:18	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:04	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Vladimir Merzliakov
11:16	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Paolo Bonzini
10:55	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Nathan Sidwell
10:44	Re: gcc for ARM in thumb mode	Richard Earnshaw
10:34	Re: VTABLE placement heuristic	Nathan Sidwell
10:19	information about gcc compiler	friz at chez dot com
10:12	Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Nathan Sidwell
10:07	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:05	Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:54	Re: 3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:59	Re: Turning off C++ casting?	Paolo Bonzini
08:50	Re: Turning off C++ casting??	Vladimir Merzliakov
07:34	Re: How to get current stack size ?	Fergus Henderson
06:51	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
06:49	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
06:47	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
06:11	Re: Virtual function placement heuristic??	Mongryong
05:52	Virtual function placement heuristic??	Mongryong
05:48	VTABLE placement heuristic	Mongryong
02:33	Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2	Alexandre Oliva
02:19	gcc for ARM in thumb mode	Dmytro Bablinyuk
02:05	Re: Turning off C++ casting??	Mongryong
01:53	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	snyder
01:43	How to get current stack size ?	Igor Bukanov
00:30	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo
00:25	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law
00:24	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Zack Weinberg
00:23	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Laurent Guerby
00:02	Re: Turning off C++ casting??	Mongryong

February 19, 2003

23:57	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Joe Buck
23:43	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
23:41	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Mike Stump
23:37	Re: Turning off C++ casting??	Mongryong
23:37	Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Neil Booth
23:17	Re: Turning off C++ casting??	Jack Lloyd
23:15	Re: [tree-ssa] Returning to alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
23:03	Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Mongryong
22:51	Turning off C++ casting??	Mongryong
22:47	[tree-ssa] Returning to alias analysis	law
22:21	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Laurent Guerby
22:12	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Mike Stump
22:06	3.2.2 broken on Solaris 8 on x86	Jochen Kmietsch
21:26	Re: IBM gcc for AIX	David Edelsohn
21:12	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
21:11	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
21:07	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
21:06	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
21:05	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
21:04	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Laurent Guerby
20:59	Re: C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Neil Booth
20:56	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Geoff Keating
20:48	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
20:29	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
20:15	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
20:11	Re: IBM gcc for AIX	Robert Dewar
20:07	Re: statistical profiling of gcc	Dale Johannesen
19:56	IBM gcc for AIX	Grzegorz_Szostak
19:47	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Benjamin Kosnik
19:43	statistical profiling of gcc	David Morrison
19:12	C++ Protected Class Members are Private???	Mongryong
19:11	Re: 3.3 target date?	Dan Kegel
18:25	Re: compare_test issue.	Karel Gardas
18:24	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Karel Gardas
18:23	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Alexander Kabaev
18:18	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mark Mitchell
18:08	Re: _GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Benjamin Kosnik
18:07	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
17:47	Re: compare_test issue.	Mike Stump
17:44	_GLIBCPP_USE_WCHAR_T undefined in FreeBSD's c++config.h?	Craig Rodrigues
17:37	Re: Mainline: C++ include files not found!	Mike Stump
17:34	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Nathan Sidwell
17:25	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Nathan Sidwell
17:12	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
16:54	m68k regression (PR9255) was Re: 3.3 target date?	Joel Sherrill
16:52	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Nathan Sidwell
16:34	Re: Gcc-3.2.2 on HPUX-IA64	Steve Ellcey
16:21	Re: fixed PRs	Brad Lucier
16:06	Re: fixed PRs	Steven Bosscher
15:57	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
15:45	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
15:25	Re: 3.3 target date?	Gerald Pfeifer
15:23	Re: fixed PRs	Gerald Pfeifer
15:07	Re: 3.3 target date?	Svein E. Seldal
15:05	fixed PRs	Brad Lucier
15:01	Re: 3.3 target date?	Eric Botcazou
14:46	Re: 3.3 target date?	Andreas Jaeger
14:40	compare_test issue.	Karel Gardas
13:58	Re: 3.3 target date?	Peter Barada
13:44	Re: 3.3 target date?	Joel Sherrill
13:29	Re: bug handling guidelines?	Daniel Berlin
12:58	Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Robert Dewar
12:47	Re: spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Allen Gwinn
11:21	Successful build of gcc-3.2.2 on alpha-dec-osf4.0f	Arnold Vogelsang
10:51	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Michal Ludvig
09:59	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
09:39	Re: bug handling guidelines?	Gerald Pfeifer
09:37	Gcc-3.2.2 on HPUX-IA64	M. Lavasani
09:34	RE: 3.3 target date?	S. Bosscher
09:31	RE: 3.3 target date?	S. Bosscher
09:23	Re: 3.3 target date?	Gerald Pfeifer
09:22	8051 port	Yek-Chong Yeo
08:52	Re: 3.3 target date?	Andreas Jaeger
07:55	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:45	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Kai Henningsen
07:35	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:55	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
06:54	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
05:16	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Loren James Rittle
05:02	bug handling guidelines?	Ben Elliston
02:54	ext/stdio_fielbuf.h	Ta-Cheng Lin
01:04	Re: optimizations	David Edelsohn
00:43	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law
00:10	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo

February 18, 2003

23:01	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
22:55	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
22:46	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Matt Austern
22:43	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Steven Bosscher
22:41	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Richard Henderson
22:39	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Matt Austern
22:29	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
22:27	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Richard Henderson
22:15	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Robert Dewar
22:12	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump
22:04	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
21:54	Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3branch.]	Toon Moene
21:35	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Michael LeBlanc
21:03	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
21:01	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Paul Brook
20:36	Re: concatenation of strings in #include directive.	Neil Booth
20:32	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Graham Stott
20:29	Re: Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Matt Austern
20:21	Bootstrap failure in toplev.c	Gerald Pfeifer
20:03	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mark Mitchell
19:59	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Aldy Hernandez
19:53	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Phil Edwards
19:20	One anomalous -O2 result	Brad Lucier
19:00	Re: gen_highpart() & volatile	Richard Henderson
18:57	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Joe Buck
18:40	Re: gen_highpart() & volatile	Dmitry
18:27	Re: gen_highpart() & volatile	Richard Henderson
18:27	Re: optimizations	Håkan Hjort
18:25	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Robert Dewar
18:20	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Richard Henderson
18:17	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	J.D. Bronson
18:16	spam list ...was GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	J.D. Bronson
18:13	Re: optimizations	Zack Weinberg
18:13	Re: optimizations	Andrew Pinski
18:13	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Joe Buck
18:10	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
17:55	Re: optimizations	Håkan Hjort
17:45	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Joe Buck
16:47	Re: 3.3 target date?	Steven Bosscher
16:26	Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3branch.]	Mark Mitchell
16:19	gen_highpart() & volatile	Dmitry
16:09	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mark Mitchell
15:09	Re: 3.3 target date?	Paolo Carlini
14:09	Re: concatenation of strings in #include directive.	Andreas Schwab
13:36	successfully built on Suse 8.0, kernel 2.4.18-64GB-SMP, glibc 2.2.5-158	Jörg Reiners
09:49	3.3 target date?	David Rasmussen
09:12	concatenation of strings in #include directive.	Nitin Gupta
08:55	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
07:40	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:23	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mark Mitchell
07:12	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Mark Mitchell
06:49	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
06:41	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Andreas Jaeger
05:59	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
04:38	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Segher Boessenkool
03:50	Re: Of threads and OpenBSD	Loren James Rittle
00:18	patch: Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Aldy Hernandez
00:04	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Geoff Keating

February 17, 2003

23:53	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Paul Brook
23:35	Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment	John David Anglin
22:33	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Kumar Gala
22:27	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Kumar Gala
22:25	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Jim Wilson
22:12	Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment	John David Anglin
20:47	Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Neil Booth
20:43	PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.	Toon Moene
20:33	Re: [PATCH]: Stack alignment	Geoff Keating
20:00	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Michael LeBlanc
19:57	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Zack Weinberg
19:52	[PATCH]: Stack alignment	John David Anglin
19:51	Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86	Piotr Kasztelowicz
19:16	Re: rfc: auto-casted vector types	Aldy Hernandez
17:04	gcc-ss-20030217 is now available	gccadmin
17:00	LINK: gcc.gnu.org	ChangingLINKS.com
16:53	Using multilibs for all library search paths	Dan Towner
16:33	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86 (patch?)	J.D. Bronson
16:27	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:02	Re: e: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Nix
15:02	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Michal Ludvig
15:02	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:02	Re: static const double pi = 3.1415;	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:01	Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:01	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Andrew Haley

February 16, 2003

22:28	Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)	Mark Wielaard
22:27	Re: PATCH for Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?	Joseph S. Myers
22:15	Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)	Graham Stott
22:11	Mainline bootstrap failure on i386-...	Gerald Pfeifer
22:08	PATCH for Re: -Wformat-sign-mismatch?	Gerald Pfeifer
21:44	Re: StrictMath.lo problem when building GCC (HEAD)	Anthony Green
21:08	PATCH for Re: Broken links, please help	Gerald Pfeifer
20:11	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Ben Elliston
19:57	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Branko Čibej
19:24	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Gerald Pfeifer
19:05	Re: dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?	Andreas Tobler
18:56	Re: dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?	Mike Stump
18:37	linking problem	Neol Anderson
16:17	dynamic/shared libraries for darwin?	Andreas Tobler
14:40	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Ben Elliston
12:41	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
08:17	Re: Broken links, please help	Kai Henningsen
05:52	Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2	Albert Chin
03:31	successful build of GCC 3.2.2	Lew Bloch
02:49	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Segher Boessenkool
02:21	Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86	Robert Hoffmann
00:41	Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86	Steven M. Christensen
00:13	static const double pi = 3.1415;	Mike Stump

February 15, 2003

23:32	Re: successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86	Robert Hoffmann
23:31	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Michal Ludvig
22:49	3.2.2 static build in cygwin	Jim Allan
22:40	Successful (C, C++, F77, Java)	Akshay Reddy
21:15	successful build gcc-3.2.2 solaris x86	Robert Hoffmann
20:58	Re: Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Fergus Henderson
20:52	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Neil Booth
20:47	Re: the size of tree_decl	Per Bothner
18:53	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Mark Hahn
18:07	Re: new C++ parser bug	Craig Rodrigues
17:17	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Gerald Pfeifer
16:56	Re: GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	Gerald Pfeifer
13:52	Re: Mainline: C++ include files not found!	Daniel Jacobowitz
10:48	Mainline: C++ include files not found!	Gerald Pfeifer
05:14	RTL generation ???	gyanindra mishra
02:36	GCC 3.2.2 build error on Solaris 9 x86	J.D. Bronson
02:01	Re: [Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3 branch.]	Richard Henderson
01:57	Re: 64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check	Richard Kenner
01:40	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
00:20	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Tim Josling
00:10	Re: 64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check	Richard Henderson
00:08	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law

February 14, 2003

23:47	Re: [tree-ssa] Build Failure	law
23:41	Re: new regression tester	Mike Stump
23:40	Re: Samba and gcc3.2.2?	Joe Buck
23:30	Re: the size of tree_decl	law
23:14	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
22:34	Samba and gcc3.2.2?	Dan Kegel
22:22	64-bit Sparc support and -fstack-check	Richard Kenner
22:20	3.2.2 additions to GCC 3.2 build status list	Janis Johnson
22:09	build of gcc 3.2.2 on Cygwin	Alan Thompson
21:35	Re: the size of tree_decl	Richard Henderson
21:32	[Fwd: Fixing PR optimization/9258 and PR fortran/7681 on 3.3 branch.]	Toon Moene
21:30	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Richard Henderson
21:22	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Richard Henderson
21:09	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Berlin
21:05	Re: [tree-ssa] Build Failure	Toon Moene
20:46	Re: the size of tree_decl	Pop Sébastian
20:40	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:35	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Jakub Jelinek
20:23	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Berlin
19:51	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:49	Re: the size of tree_decl	law
19:37	Successfully built and installed GCC 3.2.2	Jonah Simandjuntak
19:24	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Berlin
18:59	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joseph S. Myers
18:56	[tree-ssa] Build Failure	Paul Brook
18:51	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joseph S. Myers
18:34	Re: Forced initializing scalars	Chris Lattner
18:23	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Nathan Sidwell
18:14	gcc private static object constructor thread-safety (revisited)	Joe Buehler
18:10	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
18:07	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
17:46	RE: new regression tester	Dan Kegel
17:29	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Andreas Jaeger
17:25	Re: new regression tester	Phil Edwards
17:14	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Michael S . Zick
17:04	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
16:57	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Andrew Haley
16:42	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Daniel Berlin
16:36	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Daniel Berlin
16:17	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Josef Zlomek
16:10	Re: Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Josef Zlomek
16:07	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
16:04	Wrong mappin of registers in location lists	Michal Ludvig
15:50	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Michael S . Zick
15:31	Re: Location lists again	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:26	Re: Reference to .debug_loc	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:58	Reference to .debug_loc	Michal Ludvig
14:43	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
14:24	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
14:16	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
14:14	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
14:02	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
13:58	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
13:52	Re: new regression tester	Geoff Keating
13:30	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Geert Bosch
12:47	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Earnshaw
12:36	Re: Location lists again	Michal Ludvig
12:10	Re: new regression tester	Gerald Pfeifer
11:52	Re: new regression tester	Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:48	Re: new regression tester	Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:42	new regression tester	Ben Elliston
08:49	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
08:46	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Daniel Berlin
08:44	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Daniel Berlin
08:43	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Diego Novillo
08:32	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
08:17	Successful build of gcc3.2.2 on WinXP/cygwin	Oliver Jennrich
08:00	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
07:46	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Marcel Cox
07:20	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
07:19	Re: c99status.html - split up per release?	Zack Weinberg
07:13	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
06:59	[cxx-reflection] Merge from trunk as of 2003-02-14	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:43	Re: c99status.html - split up per release?	Gerald Pfeifer
05:57	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Andreas Tobler
04:48	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Chris Lattner
04:45	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
04:39	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
03:06	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Phil Edwards
02:41	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Zack Weinberg
01:25	Re: gcc internals question	Spundun Bhatt
01:19	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Segher Boessenkool
00:56	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	cgd
00:48	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Bruce Stephens
00:38	Re: The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Joseph S. Myers
00:31	The 'gcc-g++' module name is broken	Phil Edwards
00:18	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Mike Stump
00:11	c99status.html - split up per release?	Zack Weinberg

February 13, 2003

23:13	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Andi Kleen
23:06	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Nathan Sidwell
23:03	Re: contributors HOWTO?	Joseph S. Myers
23:00	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	Kazu Hirata
22:56	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joseph S. Myers
22:54	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Mike Stump
22:40	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	David Carlton
22:37	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
22:31	Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions	Karel Gardas
22:24	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Henderson
22:08	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
22:04	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Richard Henderson
22:00	Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions	Matt Austern
21:49	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Florian Weimer
21:47	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	David Edelsohn
21:38	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Andreas Tobler
21:38	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Florian Weimer
21:18	Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions	Ziemowit Laski
21:14	Successful build	'David Scott Urban
21:10	Make Error with GCC	Mike Cleary
21:09	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
21:05	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:02	rfc: auto-casted vector types	Aldy Hernandez
21:01	Re: new C++ parser bug	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:57	Re: GCC Compile-Time Regressions	Neil Booth
20:57	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Chris Lattner
20:55	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Neil Booth
20:53	GCC Compile-Time Regressions	Ziemowit Laski
20:47	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Neil Booth
20:43	Re: new C++ parser bug	Paolo Carlini
20:41	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	tm_gccmail
20:35	new C++ parser bug	Matt Austern
20:14	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:59	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:58	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:56	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:50	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Fergus Henderson
19:47	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
19:46	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	tm_gccmail
19:42	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
19:38	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Erik Trulsson
19:37	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:33	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Tim Josling
19:32	contributors HOWTO?	Jose E. Marchesi
19:31	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	Gary Van Sickle
19:26	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Andrew Haley
19:23	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:22	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	tm_gccmail
19:19	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
19:10	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:08	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:07	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:06	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
19:05	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
19:04	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Henderson
19:03	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
19:03	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Andrew Haley
18:58	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Henderson
18:56	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
18:54	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
18:53	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
18:52	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
18:50	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
18:44	Re: libstdc++ related boostrap failure	Phil Edwards
18:39	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
18:33	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Andrew Haley
18:29	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Fergus Henderson
18:29	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
18:25	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
18:21	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
18:16	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
18:15	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Robert Dewar
18:06	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
18:05	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Earnshaw
17:59	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	John David Anglin
17:58	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Henderson
17:54	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
17:54	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Henderson
17:49	Re: ChangeLog conventions	Gerald Pfeifer
17:35	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
17:13	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
17:05	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
16:58	Re: fstream attach for g++3.2.1	Craig Rodrigues
16:45	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joseph S. Myers
16:43	fstream attach for g++3.2.1	Ta-Cheng Lin
16:42	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
16:40	Re: Location lists again	Daniel Berlin
16:36	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joseph S. Myers
16:34	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
16:28	Location lists again	Michal Ludvig
16:23	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Daniel Berlin
16:22	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
16:21	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo
16:14	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Earnshaw
16:13	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
16:10	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo
16:09	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
16:09	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
16:04	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
16:03	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
16:00	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Joe Buck
16:00	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
15:59	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
15:58	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
15:57	Re: [tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	Diego Novillo
15:55	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
15:52	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
15:48	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo
15:45	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
15:45	Re: gcc internals question	Ricardo Anguiano
15:36	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
15:35	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
15:33	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:32	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
15:26	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
15:23	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Diego Novillo
15:00	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
14:58	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
14:57	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Diego Novillo
14:44	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:38	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
14:31	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Roger Sayle
13:24	Re: new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	Kazu Hirata
13:09	Re: wstring class not defined - fix	Paolo Carlini
13:05	Re: [PATCH] Document arithmetic overflow semantics	Richard Kenner
13:01	wstring class not defined - fix	Doron Wloschowsky
10:48	libstdc++ related boostrap failure	Gerald Pfeifer
10:18	successfully built gcc-3.2.2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.8	Nicolas Pioch
09:49	GCC 2.7.x for HP-UX 10	Marcus Josiger
09:26	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:16	Re: cache misses in gcc 3.3	Tim Josling
09:05	ICE while bootstrapping HEAD of 2003-02-12 19:19:42 UTC	Bernd Jendrissek
08:59	e: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Tim Josling
08:20	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Henderson
08:04	Re: Oddity building 3.2.2 on AIX 4.3.2	Alexandre Oliva
06:34	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Michel LESPINASSE
06:33	Re: ANSI/ISO Compliance	Alexandre Oliva
06:31	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Michel LESPINASSE
06:14	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	John David Anglin
03:24	new-ra code sizes on Hitachi H8	tm_gccmail
02:43	Re: vrp?	Roger Sayle
02:30	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:14	gcc internals question	Spundun Bhatt
00:40	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Dale Johannesen
00:31	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Henderson
00:04	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mike Stump

February 12, 2003

23:50	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Gabriel Paubert
23:37	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Richard Henderson
23:04	[tree-ssa] CCP inefficiencies	law
23:03	Re: the size of tree_decl	law
22:53	Re: the size of tree_decl	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:47	Re: the size of tree_decl	Neil Booth
22:31	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	John David Anglin
22:26	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Franz Sirl
22:23	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Jan Hubicka
22:16	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
22:11	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
22:10	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mike Stump
22:08	Re: Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Richard Henderson
22:06	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Mike Stump
21:59	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
21:53	Re: PR 9479 (was Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (third iteration))	Franz Sirl
21:46	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
21:46	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Henderson
21:42	[patch] for gcc-3.3 *Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
21:41	STARTFILE*PREFIX*SPEC question	Steve Ellcey
21:26	Re: [wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor? (fwd)	Laurent Guerby
21:17	Using FDO to speed up compiler?	Jan Hubicka
21:07	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Franz Sirl
21:03	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
20:57	Re: vrp?	Richard Henderson
20:25	Re: the size of tree_decl	Dan Nicolaescu
20:23	Re: vrp?	Jan Hubicka
20:18	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Mike Stump
20:01	Machine and hosting donation for the GCC project	Laurent Guerby
19:57	Re: vrp?	Richard Henderson
19:52	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - THE GRAPH	Fergus Henderson
19:51	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Jan Hubicka
19:51	Re: vrp?	David Edelsohn
19:18	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Matt Austern
19:16	Re: vrp?	law
19:08	RE: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Scott Robert Ladd
19:03	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	tm_gccmail
18:59	Re: vrp?	Richard Henderson
18:55	Re: Missing file? libjava/gnu/java/nio/natSelectorImpl.h	Tom Tromey
18:47	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Tom Tromey
18:30	Compile time and effectiveness of optimizers	Steven Bosscher
18:07	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Joe Buck
18:06	TRUTH_OR_EXPR vs. TRUTH_ORIF_EXPR	Morten Welinder
18:02	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Spundun Bhatt
18:00	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Steven Bosscher
17:58	Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Fergus Henderson
17:54	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Joel Sherrill
17:52	Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers	Fergus Henderson
17:51	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds
17:48	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Joe Buck
17:47	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	tm_gccmail
17:41	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
17:40	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	David Edelsohn
17:33	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	tm_gccmail
17:30	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Richard Earnshaw
17:29	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Jan Hubicka
17:29	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
17:24	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaoru Fukui
17:21	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Andi Kleen
17:19	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds
17:11	RE: [Gomp-discuss] Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Scott Robert Ladd
17:05	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Karel Gardas
17:00	Re: Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Karel Gardas
16:49	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:48	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Andreas Tobler
16:39	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds
16:21	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	John David Anglin
16:16	Let's backport speedups from 3.4 to 3.3	Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:02	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	David Edelsohn
15:50	Re: vrp?	David Edelsohn
15:38	Re: 3.2.2 successful builds: GNU/Linux, Solaris, HP-UX	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:21	Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Devang Patel
15:17	Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Devang Patel
14:23	Re: vrp?	law
14:23	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	law
14:21	Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Karel Gardas
14:15	Re: 3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Daniel Berlin
13:54	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Kenner
13:51	3.2.2 & 3.3 branch & trunk compilation speed comparison (MICO)	Karel Gardas
13:13	Re: [wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor?	Michael Matz
13:07	Re: bootstrap failure on ppc darwin AND PPClinux	Andreas Tobler
12:56	undefined assembler operation	Daniel Miranda
12:48	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression	Nicola Pero
12:38	Of threads and OpenBSD	Marc Espie
12:31	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Jan Hubicka
12:23	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Robert Dewar
12:17	bootstrap failure on ppc darwin	Andreas Tobler
12:08	[wwwdocs] Where is the new_register_allocator anchor?	Steven Bosscher
11:32	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Jan Hubicka
11:29	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Jan Hubicka
11:14	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	Steven Bosscher
10:56	Successful build of 3.2.2 on cygwin/WinXP	Oliver Jennrich
10:42	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - A QUESTION	Michael Matz
10:40	Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers	Michael Matz
10:39	Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers	Fergus Henderson
10:21	Re: --enable-__cxa_atexit	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:10	Re: Backport fix for PR6362 to 3.2.x?	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - A QUESTION	Lars Segerlund
09:56	RE: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Rob Taylor
09:17	Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers	Richard Henderson
08:42	Re: i386 string patterns vs global registers	Fergus Henderson
08:41	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	tm_gccmail
08:30	Re: ARM interworking with different linker sections	Eric de Jong
08:26	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression	Nathanael Nerode
08:17	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Karel Gardas
08:10	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Lars Segerlund
08:06	Re: vrp?	Florian Weimer
07:59	Missing file? libjava/gnu/java/nio/natSelectorImpl.h	Bernd Jendrissek
07:57	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Per Abrahamsen
07:52	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Joseph S. Myers
07:35	Re: vrp?	Daniel Berlin
07:33	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Christoph Hellwig
07:17	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	Daniel Berlin
07:16	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Gianni Mariani
07:03	Re: vrp?	Steven Bosscher
06:58	vrp?	Richard Henderson
06:54	about extending frontend	sushil page
06:54	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Steven Bosscher
06:41	Re: the size of tree_decl	law
06:30	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law
06:23	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds
05:56	build gcc 3.2.2 on Cygwin	Alan Thompson
05:55	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Fergus Henderson
04:37	Re: [tree-ssa] alias analysis	law
04:35	Re: Working on branches while copyright paperwork being processed?	law
03:55	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Ben Elliston
03:32	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Matt Austern
02:48	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Zack Weinberg
02:28	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Joe Buck
01:26	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	tm_gccmail
01:24	GCC 3.2.2 successful build: alphaev6-dec-osf4.0f	Jonathan Lennox
01:19	Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?	Richard Henderson
01:13	about libgcc and libc.so.6 problem	Ken Chuang
01:10	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Richard Henderson
00:55	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds
00:52	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Henderson
00:42	Re: Altivec + 16 byte alignment	Richard Henderson
00:37	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	tm_gccmail
00:24	Re: Splitting adalib out into its own directory?	Zack Weinberg
00:09	Re: GCC 3.3 compile speed regression - AN ANSWER	Linus Torvalds