This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)


On 31 Jan 2003, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> | It is probably the bison thing as Paolo suggested. But I thought the
> | maintainer scripts were supposed to adjust the timestamps so as not to rely
> | on the bison in the user's environment. Dunno.
> 
> I believe that the maintainer scripts aren't that smart :-(

The maintainer scripts work fine.  The tarballs generated by the release
script include Bison-generated files generated by the person who ran the
script; when a user builds the tarball, the version of Bison they have is
irrelevant as the timestamps are correct.  When building from CVS, the
user's Bison version is relevant - but the Bison-generated files will only
be regenerated when the source file changes in CVS, not when you upgrade
Bison if the source file doesn't change.  Bison-generated files do not go
in CVS.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]