Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>]

Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

| On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:25:34PM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
|  
| > I uploaded 3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) tarballs on the FTP
| > server as
| > 
| >      ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/gcc-*3.2.2-20030129.*
| > 
| > As usual, please donwload and test them.  Report problems to me and
| > fill GNATS  PRs.
| 
| I just tested on GNU/Linux, and I am seeing new failures since yesterday's
| tarball (yesterday I had no unexpected gcc or g++ failures, and now
| there are a total of 11, from 5 distinct tests).  See
| 
| http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01306.html
| 
| It's an "up2date" Red Hat 7.2 box with binutils-2.13.1.
| 
| Could someone else run the tests and try to verify this?

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@unitus.it> writes:

| I'm also seeing those failures, unfortunately, and also:
| 
|     FAIL: g++.eh/spec6.C (test for excess errors)

Joe, Paolo --

I'm also seeing those failures with the tarball I uploaded but not 
on current version of gcc-3_2-branch (which will be the next
iteration).  

I looked into the failures and cannot find out which patches could
have possibly caused those failures.  All failures seem to be
"syntax error".  I'm inclined to conlude that the environment I used
to prepare the second iteration (which is at work) might be insane [it
is the one which started the reduce/reduce conflit thread]. 

I would like you run the testsuite again but for current CVS
gcc-3_2-branch and report the results.  Thank you very much for your
time.  

-- Gaby