This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 30 Jan 2003 23:04:04 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <15927.61897.77306.255799@gauvain.inria.fr><20030129135455.A10912@synopsys.com>

Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com> writes:

| On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 04:25:34PM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
|  
| > I uploaded 3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration) tarballs on the FTP
| > server as
| > 
| >      ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/gcc-*3.2.2-20030129.*
| > 
| > As usual, please donwload and test them.  Report problems to me and
| > fill GNATS  PRs.
| 
| I just tested on GNU/Linux, and I am seeing new failures since yesterday's
| tarball (yesterday I had no unexpected gcc or g++ failures, and now
| there are a total of 11, from 5 distinct tests).  See
| 
| http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01306.html

Numbers from 

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01325.html

are indicating something different -- which puzzles me.  
I just ran a full bootstrap + regression testsuite and saw two
failures related to C99 format specifiers on en i868-pc-linux-gnu.

I'm bootstrapping on another host.  

I'll keep you informed as things evolve.

-- Gaby

References:
- GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
  - From: Gabriel Dos_Reis
- Re: GCC-3.2.2 pre-release (second iteration)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]