This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GNAT nightmarre
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:13:16 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: GNAT nightmarre
> I don't dispute the consistency requirement, it is very natural. It is
> *the way the tools are invoked* that imply more (unintended)
> requirements that I find unnatural.
Can you be a little clearer about what these " more (unintended) requirements"
are?
Certainly we all agree that it should be easy to build and we should try
to
a) find out what you are running into
b) bulletproof the make file if possible from this error