This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment

From: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at www dot eyesopen dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:20:56 -0800
Subject: Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301250850500.17491-100000@www.eyesopen.com> <20030127093745.A20350@synopsys.com> <20030127201341.GA10140@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:13:42PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Ah, but what caused that enormous jump around Dec. 18 or so?
> > Can anyone pinpoint the day it occurred?
> >
> The switch to the new configury harness had a negative impact on
> bootstrap times (25% slowdown after BIB got merged with
> mainline):
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg01663.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-12/msg01672.html

Hmm.  Some of this will just charge time to the bootstrap that previously
was paid as part of the configure command, but that effect should not be
so large, I would think.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]