This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Named warnings

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at redhat dot com>
To: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 27 Jan 2003 14:53:26 -0500
Subject: Re: RFC: Named warnings
References: <004401c2c3cc$d7997ba0$a602623e@philo><3E31831D.5090906@apple.com>

>-Efoo seemed most concise, plus it would stand out better when
>reading a long compiler line.  Right now only -E by itself is
>used, so there's not really an overloading problem.

Only -E is used by gcc itself, but there many be some systems that use -Efoo
for assembler/linker options.  You have to check all gcc specs files to be
sure.

I see EB, EL, and Eb are in current use by some targets to specify endianness.
Otherwise, -Efoo seems safe.

Jim

References:
- Re: RFC: Named warnings
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: RFC: Named warnings
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]