This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- Cc: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>,Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>, Andi Kleen <ak at suse dot de>,zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 14:32:51 -0500
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 garbage collector defaults
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Phil Edwards wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:04:37PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
Benjamin Kosnik writes:
Ben> Aaaaaaaaaaghh!!!!!! Why aren't these flags documented!!!! Why
aren't
Ben> the defaults sane???
The defaults are very sane for a 128MB 200MHz system :-).
Which just goes to show two things:
1) SOMEbody *cough*david*cough* needs to drop some cash on new
hardware, and
Hey, he is willing to drop cash on new hardware.
It's just that they don't accept buffalo head nickels and wooden
pennies anymore.
2) the defaults should adjust themselves to the host's memory.
I'm in agreement with Phil here.
We just need to figure out what the equations are to do this.