This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
- From: Jeff Sturm <jsturm at one-point dot com>
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 01:23:51 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: 3.3-branch QA assessment
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> I'm not sure if the default
> determined in the gcc dir is passed along when configuring libgcj or
> not.
It is. AFAIK libjava/configure uses the output of `gcc -v` to determine
its thread model.
> At Jeff's urging, just to be sure I tried --enable-threads and
> still basically got the same failures here:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2003-01/msg01078.html
Right, the thread model inquiry was a dead end.
> The diffs from the previous link way above are basically that without
> --enable-threads, some of the failing tests appear more than once.
> I.e. TLtest, Thread_Join, Thread_Monitor and Thread_Wait_2 all appear
> twice without --enable-threads and once with --enable-threads.
I see none of those test failures on Solaris 2.8 regardless of the
configure options I've tried. My hunch now is that something
important changed from 2.7 to 2.8 but have no way to prove it.
Hopefully I'll have test results posted shortly.
Jeff