This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Re: c++ "with" keyword
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, normanjonas at arcor dot de
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 19:33:47 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Re: c++ "with" keyword
> My viewpoint is slightly different: GCC *should* be used as an arena for
> implementing random language extensions, but in general those extensions
> should not be merged into the main CVS branch. (They would only be merged
> on the main branch if there is a *very* convincing case made for them.)
Yes, of course it is fine to use GCC as an arena for playing with language
extensions. I did not mean to imply otherwise. I was talking about the
official release.