This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series
- From: "D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida" <dvenkat at noida dot hcltech dot com>
- To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>, Andrew dot Volkov at transas dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, crossgcc at sources dot redhat dot com, gnuh8 at gnuh8 dot org dot uk
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 10:35:50 +0530
- Subject: RE: New targets to Binutils for H8 series
Hi,
And probably new targets for h8300h and h8300s with -mint32 specified.
I have seen such combinations in some other targets. Could be useful
in making changes for the simulator.
Regards,
Venky
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kazu Hirata [mailto:kazu@cs.umass.edu]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 3:55 AM
> To: Andrew.Volkov@transas.com
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; crossgcc@sources.redhat.com; gnuh8@gnuh8.org.uk
> Subject: Re: New targets to Binutils for H8 series
>
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> > Good idea, but I think also will be good, mark 26xx subtarget as
> > new bfd-target too.
>
> I am basically for having a subtarget for each combination of
> instruction set and mode. However, if we have .h2600 or something,
> then we should probably have "upward compatibility" thing built into
> the linker so that we can mix H8S/2600 code with H8S or H8/300H. This
> way, we don't have to have separate libgcc.a and lib[mc].a, etc, for
> H8S/2600 because the difference of instruction sets between H8S and
> H8S/200 is only mac-related instructions.
>
> Kazu Hirata
>