This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++ "with" keyword
- From: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
- To: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, normanjonas at arcor dot de
- Date: 04 Jan 2003 16:59:58 +0200
- Subject: Re: c++ "with" keyword
- References: <20030104142915.3BD6EF2DF9@nile.gnat.com>
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:
Robert> If you think "with" is valuable, then the task is to convince the
Robert> guardians of the C++ standard of this. If you can't convince the
Not related to this particular "with" discussion, but I couldn't
disagree more. A standards body should not invent language
"features", but rather codify existing (proven) extensions.
Robert> C++ community to add the feature, then I think it is a mistake
Robert> for gcc to second guess.
What community ? Compiler developers add features.
~velco