This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: An unusual Performance approach using Synthetic registers, and a request for guidance.

On Friday 27 December 2002 10:07 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 27, 2002, "Michael S. Zick" <> wrote:
> > So, I think (personal opinion here), using the %EBX register as the base
> > (frame pointer) of the synthetic register frames should be your first
> > choice.
> 'cept %EBX is used as the PIC base register, and you can't really
> remap that to a virtual register unless you change PLT entries.
Indeed, that could well present a technical challenge.
Depends on how the question behind the project is approached.

For the general question:
"If a complex instruction set machine had as many registers as
a RISC machine, what..."

I see two approachs to investigating this sort of question;

1) Modify the compiler to support, in general, Synthetic Register Arrays.
Wherein one could/would butt heads with any and all current design 
decisions for a particular port....

2) Do a "new port" to a Synthetic Machine that 99% maps to real hardware,
leaving the compiler internals untouched.
You get to make your own design decisions that way and perhaps learn
if path (1) above is worth doing.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]