This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: hunt for mainline regressions
- From: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rodrigc at attbi dot com, bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 09:38:03 -0800
- Subject: Re: hunt for mainline regressions
- References: <20021217164407.A6097@us.ibm.com> <20021218081617.A23718@u1sparc.j-son.org>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:16:22AM +0100, Christian Jönsson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 04:44:07PM -0800, Janis Johnson wrote:
> > My regression hunting is pretty well automated now, but I'm still
> > figuring out new little tricks and then updating my scripts and
> > howto document accordingly. I hope to send those out again soon for
> > review.
> >
> > I'm selecting regressions to hunt somewhat randomly from among the ones
> > for which Wolfgang Bangerth has identified a half-month range when it
> > occurred. If you'd like me to search for a particular regression from
> > his list, let me know.
>
> well, not sure this is on his list, but anyhow, c++/8183 has been a
> problem for a while.
It's not on his list because the bug doesn't show up on i686-linux.
I tried it on ia64-linux and powerpc64-linux and don't see it on either
of those; if I can't reproduce it, I can't hunt for the patch that
caused it to start failing.
> Sometime Sept 12 2002 the mainline, then 3.3 (experimental) worked for
> sparc64-{linux,solaris*} targets. Then, sometime, it stopped. I think
> before the end if Sept 2002.
>
> I really don't know how to hunt the bug down... :-( it might be kernel
> related, it might very well be libc related...
I don't see how an ICE would be related to the kernel or libc. Can you
reproduce it by doing a simple build (rather than a bootstrap) of G++,
using a recent version of GCC for the build? If so, you might want to
try my new scripts.
Janis