This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: basic-improvements call for testers
- From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:56:50 +0100
- Subject: Re: basic-improvements call for testers
- References: <87y96se9bx.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>
>
> I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements
> branch. My tests show only one significant difference between
> testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an
> additional failure of the libjava testsuite. As the libjava test
> suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the
> mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it. A pseudo-diff
> is appended to this message; if a test suite isn't mentioned, it had
> no differences at all between mainline and branch.
>
> Please test the branch and report results using test_summary, but also
> copy me; I don't follow gcc-testresults.
>
> I'm aware of three blocker issues for the merge:
>
> - The 32x64 HOST_WIDE_INT problem, which I will be addressing shortly.
> - foobar-c.c lacking appropriate dependencies on coretypes.h $(TM_H),
> which I will also address shortly.
> - The Darwin sqrt stub problem, which I don't know enough about to
> fix; I'd appreciate it if one of the people experiencing it could
> look into a patch.
I tried sparc and mips targets on rtlopt branch (that is based on BIB
branch). On sparc I run into 32x64 host problem you mention. Mips
bootstrap got syntax error.
So in short I am going to bootstrap mips and sparc32 now.
Honza
>
> If you know of or discover other issues which you think should block
> the merge, please say so.
>
> Regarding check-in policies, I would recommend the following:
>
> - For the time being, nothing goes onto mainline unless it is also
> going onto the 3.3 release branch. To make my life easier, please
> test and apply such patches on the basic-improvements branch also.
>
> - basic-improvements is open for checkins under its usual rules,
> i.e. Stage 2 patches only.
>
> I'd like to get the blocker issues all resolved and the branch merged
> to mainline by Monday. Any help you can lend is greatly appreciated.
>
> zw
>
> --- mainline/report 2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
> +++ 3.4bib/report 2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
>
> -Compiler version: 3.3 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> +Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
>
> === g++ Summary ===
>
> -# of expected passes 7891
> +# of expected passes 7899
> # of unexpected failures 2
> -# of expected failures 92
> +# of expected failures 90
> # of untested testcases 9
> # of unsupported tests 3
>
> === gcc Summary ===
>
> -# of expected passes 20746
> +# of expected passes 20781
> # of unexpected failures 6
> # of expected failures 64
> -# of unsupported tests 73
> +# of unsupported tests 75
>
> === libjava tests ===
>
> ...
> WARNING: program timed out.
> FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
> WARNING: program timed out.
> +FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test
> +WARNING: program timed out.
> FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
> FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
> FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
> ...
>
> === libjava Summary ===
>
> -# of expected passes 2772
> -# of unexpected failures 65
> +# of expected passes 2770
> +# of unexpected failures 66
> # of expected failures 14
> -# of untested testcases 69
> +# of untested testcases 70