This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: basic-improvements call for testers


> 
> I have now committed a merge from trunk to the 3.4 basic-improvements
> branch.  My tests show only one significant difference between
> testsuite results on the mainline and the branch: that is an
> additional failure of the libjava testsuite.  As the libjava test
> suite is currently in bad shape with 65 unexpected failures on the
> mainline, I am not inclined to hold the merge over it.  A pseudo-diff
> is appended to this message; if a test suite isn't mentioned, it had
> no differences at all between mainline and branch.
> 
> Please test the branch and report results using test_summary, but also
> copy me; I don't follow gcc-testresults.
> 
> I'm aware of three blocker issues for the merge:
> 
> - The 32x64 HOST_WIDE_INT problem, which I will be addressing shortly.
> - foobar-c.c lacking appropriate dependencies on coretypes.h $(TM_H),
>   which I will also address shortly.
> - The Darwin sqrt stub problem, which I don't know enough about to
>   fix; I'd appreciate it if one of the people experiencing it could
>   look into a patch.
I tried sparc and mips targets on rtlopt branch (that is based on BIB
branch).  On sparc I run into 32x64 host problem you mention.  Mips
bootstrap got syntax error.
So in short I am going to bootstrap mips and sparc32 now.

Honza
> 
> If you know of or discover other issues which you think should block
> the merge, please say so.
> 
> Regarding check-in policies, I would recommend the following:
> 
> - For the time being, nothing goes onto mainline unless it is also
>   going onto the 3.3 release branch.  To make my life easier, please
>   test and apply such patches on the basic-improvements branch also.
> 
> - basic-improvements is open for checkins under its usual rules,
>   i.e. Stage 2 patches only.
> 
> I'd like to get the blocker issues all resolved and the branch merged
> to mainline by Monday.  Any help you can lend is greatly appreciated.
> 
> zw
> 
> --- mainline/report     2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
> +++ 3.4bib/report       2002-12-14 10:14:49 -0800
>  
> -Compiler version: 3.3 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> +Compiler version: 3.4-bi 20021213 (experimental) (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
> 
>                 === g++ Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           7891
> +# of expected passes           7899
>  # of unexpected failures       2
> -# of expected failures         92
> +# of expected failures         90
>  # of untested testcases        9
>  # of unsupported tests         3
>  
>                 === gcc Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           20746
> +# of expected passes           20781
>  # of unexpected failures       6
>  # of expected failures         64
> -# of unsupported tests         73
> +# of unsupported tests         75
> 
>                 === libjava tests ===
> 
>  ...
>  WARNING: program timed out.
>  FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
>  WARNING: program timed out.
> +FAIL: SyncTest execution - bytecode->native test
> +WARNING: program timed out.
>  FAIL: SyncTest execution - gij test
>  FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
>  FAIL: Thread_Alive execution - gij test
>  ...
>  
>                 === libjava Summary ===
>  
> -# of expected passes           2772
> -# of unexpected failures       65
> +# of expected passes           2770
> +# of unexpected failures       66
>  # of expected failures         14
> -# of untested testcases        69
> +# of untested testcases        70


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]