Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> writes:
*twisted half-grin*
For the top level, I'd been unable to avoid writing
complete replacements for AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CXX, and it
was really nasty.
So this is actually better than I'd hoped.
Can you explain a bit about why this is necessary? It's not at all
obvious to me.
AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CXX, at least in autoconf 2.13, simply didn't
handle build!=host builds well. Furthermore, I needed an equivalent to
find CC_FOR_TARGET and CXX_FOR_TARGET, and there's no such thing, which
left me making a replacement. Not a very different replacement, mind you.