This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Saga of m68k PIC continues

>> Note the removal of the (const ... ) in insn 11.
>> 
>> Any ideas where this is being stripped off?
>
>GCC will happily put in the subreg when your machine description accept
>it.

I don't see how subregs take care of -fPIC and (unspec ...).  Could
you explain?

>There are hooks defining valid addresses and constants and these
>must refuse invalid stuff, like (symbol_ref:SI ("foo") is for PIC.

Do you mean that GO_IF_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS needs to reject a raw
(symbol_ref:SI ("foo")) if in pic mode,  which would then force the
addr to be pushed through LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS(I think) where it would
spot the raw symbol_ref in pic mode and by wrap it in a (const
(uspec:SI [...] 3))? 

-- 
Peter Barada                                   Peter.Barada@motorola.com
Wizard                                         781-852-2768 (direct)
WaveMark Solutions(wholly owned by Motorola)   781-270-0193 (fax)
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]