This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 13:03:32 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: [basic-improvements] bootstrap failure on x86
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > - && !x86_64_immediate_operand (operands[1], DImode)"
> > + && !x86_64_immediate_operand (operands[1], DImode) && 1"
>
> Hmm, now I remember the reason for && 1. The patterns looks same but
> when one fails the other is used. OK I will re-add the && 1 as obvious
> fix.
And add a comment for that effect. Otherwise later people will wonder
again about the useless "&& 1" and remove it. It's highly magic ;-)
Ciao,
Michael.