This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: (ti)c4x maintainer
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein dot Seldal at solidas dot com>
- Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at redhat dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:07:51 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: (ti)c4x maintainer
- References: <200211261518.KAA24716@makai.watson.ibm.com><email@example.com> <3DE40459.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Svein E. Seldal wrote:
> The other option was to make someone else approve and apply them, but I
> dont know whose chain to rattle. Even despite the fact that the patch
> was sent to the gcc-patches list, does not guarantee that someone other
> than the maintainer picks it up. An example is the patch that is
> approved medio. october but not applied.
This is unfortunate, yes.
Given that you already had an account on sources.redhat.com/gcc.gnu.org
that you are maintaining the binutils port for that target, I have now
enabled CVS write access to the GCC repository as well.
Please add yourself to the "Write After Approval" section of the
MAINTAINERS file of GCC, perform a full build and test run and then
commit those patches that already have been _approved_.
Gerald "Jerry" email@example.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/