This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)

From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
To: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>, Diego Novillo<dnovillo at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Benjamin Kosnik<bkoz at redhat dot com>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, "pcarlini at unitus dot it"<pcarlini at unitus dot it>, "libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 23:04:18 +0100
Subject: Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
Organization: Moene Computational Physics, Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
References: <20021204194110.GA13428@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <200212042054.gB4Ksb008847@piper.synopsys.com> <20021204210809.GO5173@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021204213956.GD3050@daikokuya.co.uk> <20021204214715.GR5173@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20021204215244.GE3050@daikokuya.co.uk>

Neil Booth wrote:

There must be ways of getting it faster.  lcc is a *lot* faster, a lot
smaller, and doesn't produce code that is much worse.  Its parser is well-
written; I'd bet it's faster than LCC's CPP.  Most of our parser problems
come from a poor tree IL and bison.

I vote we force GCC developers to bootstrap on 100MHz Pentia for 1 year.

Must be the language.

Once again I'm repeating the old adage: People *never* complain to my about the speed of g77, just about the speed of the generated code.

--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
Join GNU Fortran 95: http://g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)

References:
- merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: merging for 3.4 (was Re: [Patch] Qualify min(), max() ...)
  - From: Neil Booth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]