This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Representing EH in GENERIC

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>, "Jeffrey A. Law" <law at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:33:56 -0800
Subject: Re: Representing EH in GENERIC
References: <wvlk7iybyo7.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com> <20021127195546.GD31043@redhat.com> <wvl3cpmbm0i.fsf@prospero.boston.redhat.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 07:01:17PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I actually meant that regardless of whether or not they have separate tree
> codes.  If there are distinct tree codes, they would still go in the
> handler operand of the TRY_CATCH_EXPR, the idea being that the notion of an
> EH region can be separated from what you do if you see an exception.

I guess that seems reasonable.


r~

References:
- Representing EH in GENERIC
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Representing EH in GENERIC
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Representing EH in GENERIC
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]