This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM not using .file/.loc

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 16:39:39 -0500
Subject: Re: ARM not using .file/.loc
References: <20021121191052.GJ12079@redhat.com> <200211212135.gALLZRx27800@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 09:35:27PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:21:17PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Any reason we shouldn't just add 'arm*-*-*' to the insn=nop case?
> > 
> > Not that I know of.
> > 
> > 
> > r~
> 
> What precisely is this supposed to be for?

Sorry, could've been clearer: this is used to run certain tests on GAS
(and LD?).  Among them are whether we can emit .file/.loc for DWARF-2
instead of having to generate the .debug_line section ourselves in
.byte directives.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ARM not using .file/.loc
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

References:
- Re: ARM not using .file/.loc
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: ARM not using .file/.loc
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]