This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Vendor version strings
- From: Graeme Peterson <gp at qnx dot com>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:02:52 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Vendor version strings
Thanks, Zack!
Cheers.
GP
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Graeme Peterson <gp@qnx.com> writes:
>
> > "To avoid version conflicts, vendors are expected to modify the file
> > `gdb/version.in' to include a vendor unique alphabetic identifier (an
> > official GDB release never uses alphabetic characters in its version
> > identifer)."
> >
> > We are in the process of fixing our version string for QNX's release
> > of gdb.
> >
> > Are there any similar requirements for gcc and binutils? If so, what
> > files need modifying, and what conventions are there?
>
> For gcc, see gcc/version.c:
>
> # /* This is the string reported as the version number by all components
> # of the compiler. If you distribute a modified version of GCC,
> # please modify this string to indicate that, e.g. by putting your
> # organization's name in parentheses at the end of the string. */
>
> and
>
> # /* This is the location of the online document giving instructions for
> # reporting bugs. If you distribute a modified version of GCC,
> # please change this to refer to a document giving instructions for
> # reporting bugs to you, not us. (You are of course welcome to
> # forward us bugs reported to you, if you determine that they are
> # not bugs in your modifications.) */
>
> It would be good to annotate the manual, via
> doc/include/gcc-common.texi, as well.
>
> zw
>