Re: libstdc++.so.x issue

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -0500, Shen Wu wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> 
> Thank you very much for you information. It clarifies the number of my
> doubts in respect of the gcc compatibility.  As you pointed out we do need
> to rebuild our SDK for each of new GCC if it changes ABI i.e. with new
> libstdc++.so.x.

Or do what many vendors do and simply don't use a newer version of GCC.

> I have not seen the Linux venders starting put all the
> versions of libstdc++.so.x in the Linux distributions yet. For instance
> in Redhat 8.0, we only have libstdc++.so.5 and do not have previous versions.

The different versions are usually in different packages.


-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002