Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??

[Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>]

> On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > > For the b-i-b tester, 176.gcc hasn't built in a while.  However,
> > > gzip and gap seem fine.
> > I've just fixed the problem that broke gcc so hope it will build
> > tomorrow.
> >
> OK, thanks.
> 
> > I have no idea what is causing the regressions.  THe patch from day they
> > happent does not show anything interesting, so it may be just setup
> > change, but that looks unlikely too.
> > 
> Could it be some stray process running in the background?  The

I didn't found any :(
Aditionally the permanent and daily testers runs different machines
and the gap problem is visible on both, the other two are not.
The BIB wasn't synchronized for a while, so at least gap problem may be
real.
I will check daily tester to see what happen there.

Honza
> graphs for b-i-b at http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/
> have been relatively smooth over the past few days.
> 
> 
> Diego.