This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 11:11:25 -0500
Subject: Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
Organization: Red Hat Canada
References: <3DD63B94.3030506@unitus.it> <20021116155243.GA19681@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <20021116155456.GB21948@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Jan Hubicka wrote:

> > For the b-i-b tester, 176.gcc hasn't built in a while.  However,
> > gzip and gap seem fine.
> I've just fixed the problem that broke gcc so hope it will build
> tomorrow.
>
OK, thanks.

> I have no idea what is causing the regressions.  THe patch from day they
> happent does not show anything interesting, so it may be just setup
> change, but that looks unlikely too.
> 
Could it be some stray process running in the background?  The
graphs for b-i-b at http://people.redhat.com/dnovillo/spec2000/
have been relatively smooth over the past few days.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: What's happening to SPEC's 164.gzip/176.gcc/254.gap??
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]