This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > If this is simple for you to check, can I please ask you to do a > comparative SPECint{95, 2000} run with and without > -fno-reorder-blocks together with whatever other flags you use > with -O2, for main trunk and perhaps also the 3.2 branch? If > not, I'll eventually do it myself for SPECint2000. I have a > license. Maybe it has been done before, but I can't find any > references. > Sure. I've added -fno-reorder-blocks to both SPEC2000 and SPEC95 runs. They should take effect in tonight's run (5:00 UTC). > If not, can I please have a copy of the scripts used to simplify > the SPEC setup and result comparison? (Perhaps they can be > added to gcc/contrib/?) > Attached. The scripts can run both SPEC 95 and 2000. Let me know if you need help setting things up. I have no problem adding the files to gcc/contrib/. What's the approval process? Just like any other patch? Diego.
Attachment:
perf-scripts-20021112.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |