This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
- From: Ulrich Weigand <weigand at immd1 dot informatik dot uni-erlangen dot de>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 23:38:41 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: gcc 3.2.1 schedule?
Joe Buck wrote:
>Now I'm confused. Doesn't stage 1 (where, in your case, 2.95.3 is being
>built for the first time by 3.2) run without optimization at all? If so,
>how can -fno-strict-aliasing have an effect?
Hmm, good question. The case I had been debugging was a bit different
in that it was a non-bootstrapped build of a gcc 2.x cross-compiler
by a 3.x compiler. In that case the build did use optimization (-O2 IIRC).
Are you sure the stage 1 builds run without optimization? (I'm currently
on vacation and don't have the gcc sources installed here, so I can't
readily check ...)
Bye,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
weigand@informatik.uni-erlangen.de