This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: release status and optimization/8334
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:48:39AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> > We currently have 13 high-priority PRs that aren't marked as
> > [mainline regression].
> >
> > c++/7385,8036,8116,8338,8372,8391
> > bootstrap/7090,8362
> > libstdc++/6746
> > target/7856,8343
> > optimization/8334
> > other/8314
> >
> > About half of these are not so severe. I can only identify one PR that is
> > scary enough to make 3.2.1 unshippable even under the weaker criterion
> > "definitely an improvement over 3.2": optimization/8334.
> >
> > This PR is a regression against even 3.2, affects C, and generates an ICE
> > on a trivial nested loop, of a form that is likely to appear in scientific
> > code. Furthermore the audit trail shows no activity. Have any gurus
> > found time to look at this one?
> >
>
> It works for me with
>
> # /usr/gcc-3.2/bin/gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/gcc-3.2/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.1/specs
> Configured with: /export/gnu/src/gcc-3.2/gcc/configure --enable-clocale=gnu
> --with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-haifa
> --disable-checking --prefix=/usr/gcc-3.2 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.2.1 20021030 (prerelease)
>
> I believe that bug should be closed unless it comes from the FSF gcc.
It also worked on 20021002, and it also works for me on 20021030. Can
you still reproduce this, Joe?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer