This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: release status and optimization/8334
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:34:40 -0800
- Subject: Re: release status and optimization/8334
- References: <200210311848.g9VImdu05266@piper.synopsys.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 10:48:39AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> We currently have 13 high-priority PRs that aren't marked as
> [mainline regression].
>
> c++/7385,8036,8116,8338,8372,8391
> bootstrap/7090,8362
> libstdc++/6746
> target/7856,8343
> optimization/8334
> other/8314
>
> About half of these are not so severe. I can only identify one PR that is
> scary enough to make 3.2.1 unshippable even under the weaker criterion
> "definitely an improvement over 3.2": optimization/8334.
>
> This PR is a regression against even 3.2, affects C, and generates an ICE
> on a trivial nested loop, of a form that is likely to appear in scientific
> code. Furthermore the audit trail shows no activity. Have any gurus
> found time to look at this one?
>
It works for me with
# /usr/gcc-3.2/bin/gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/gcc-3.2/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.1/specs
Configured with: /export/gnu/src/gcc-3.2/gcc/configure --enable-clocale=gnu
--with-system-zlib --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-haifa
--disable-checking --prefix=/usr/gcc-3.2 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.1 20021030 (prerelease)
I believe that bug should be closed unless it comes from the FSF gcc.
H.J.