This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:31:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
References: <20021024050120.GA4017@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <98BED62E-E70F-11D6-BD0B-000393122612@physics.uc.edu> <20021024053101.GA4124@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <hoy98o4b9e.fsf@gee.suse.de> <20021024065215.GA4403@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:52:15PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Why offer a priority field of "high" if it can't be set?

Because the maintainers can set it, but you can't.

> Why have a submitter-id field when only a single choice is validate?

No idea.

> Why ask for the release info when you also ask for the output of gcc -v?

So that one can quickly scan to see what release the PR applies to.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Phil Edwards

References:
- Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Steve Kargl
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Simple code produces ICE in gcc-3.2.1
  - From: Steve Kargl

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]