This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers
- From: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
- To: Joe Buck <jbuck at synopsys dot com>
- Cc: mark at codesourcery dot com, bkoz at redhat dot com, nickc at redhat dot com, rearnsha at arm dot com, jakub at redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 07:18:26 -0500
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.2.1 -- Request for Bug Fixers
- Organization: OAR Corporation
- References: <200210240111.g9O1BOi16473@piper.synopsys.com>
Joe Buck wrote:
>
> > We've got about 13 high-priority regressions that we need to fix
> > before GCC 3.2.1 at this point. We've made huge progress over the
> > last week or two; a final push now can put us over the top.
>
> Yes, the number has gone down even though we made about six more bugs
> priority "high" in the last couple of days.
>
> The 3.2.1 release note it getting big; I'll hold off on reposting it
> for a bit since the bug fixes are rolling in.
>
> I count 12 definite, and 2 in feedback:
>
> 6545 in feedback state since Aug.
> 7090 it appears that a patch was applied for this one, but it is still
> in "feedback" state.
>
> Any idea about those two, are they real?
>
> The other 12 are
>
> 5509, 6718, 6746, 6981, 6994, 7228, 7266, 7363, 7385, 7856, 7944, 8067
>
> and the other 12 high-priority PRs only affect the trunk
I couldn't file it as high priority and didn't want to bump it up to
high until I had a fix for it but I would like to see PR8314 fixed
in 3.2.1 and the trunk.
Also the bug Pater Barada is tracking down seems to impact a number
of m68k/coldfire users (PR8309). If someone could fix that in time
for 3.2.1, it would be appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-10/msg01441.html
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985