This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Does 'make install' changes xgcc?

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Ritu Sabharwal <ritu at csa dot iisc dot ernet dot in>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, tprince at computer dot org
Date: 13 Oct 2002 18:22:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210140052430.20054-100000@diamond.csa.iisc.ernet.in>

>>>>> "Ritu" == Ritu Sabharwal <ritu@csa.iisc.ernet.in> writes:

 > xgcc -Bprefix -da -O3 test.c

if you haven't installed the tree, then -Bprefix won't help, as
there's nothing in prefix/ yet.

I suggest going into the gcc directory, doing a "make check",
interrupting it after a few seconds, going into "testsuite/gcc.log"
and doing whatever it is doing to compile tests.

If you're testing C++, more magic incantations may be needed.  In this
case, it's easier to do:

export LD_PRELOAD=/build-dir/triplet/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs/libstdc++.so

or some oddity like that.  But I assume you're working with C, not C++.

Cheers.
Aldy

References:
- Does 'make install' changes xgcc?
  - From: Ritu Sabharwal

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]