This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Tobler <toa at pop dot agri dot ch>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, jingham at apple dot com, Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 10:30:48 +0100
- Subject: Re: 2 new regression on darwin6.1
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> >>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > so far I couldn't find what is the reason for, but on darwin6.1 I get
> > 2 regressions by this evening.
> > IOW, the tests passed with last nights cvs on trunk. It must have
> > happend during the last 8 hours.
>
> > Here the failing TC's:
>
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assembler.S spurious warning (test for bogus
> > messages, line 7)
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/assembler.S (test for excess errors)
>
> This might be a dejagnu bug. It may also be some silly OS bug when
> spawning lots of processes. It gets confused, and you end up getting
> bogus errors. I don't know if this is fixed in Jaguar, but I know
> that in previous versions you'd have to do "make check" a few times
> and report the union of the runs :).
No, I think it's real. It came up for me last night on an arm-elf run. I
don't recall seeing that one before.
R.