This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich dot Weigand at de dot ibm dot com>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 07 Oct 2002 14:04:04 -0600
Subject: Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
References: <OF9AF5D7D8.919DA8C1-ONC1256C46.0051650B@de.ibm.com><87wup0oaew.fsf@fleche.redhat.com><1033740983.29748.446.camel@elsschot>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

Mark> The attached patch (untested) does this.

I think this is ok.

Mark> But whatever we decide we should at least document it
Mark> somewhere. I looked but couldn't find this in the gcj manual. Is
Mark> it documented somewhere else?

It is alluded to in the `Invoking gij' node, but never explicitly
documented.  I thought there was a PR for this but I can't find that
either.

Tom

References:
- glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
  - From: Ulrich Weigand
- Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: glibc-2.2.5 bug triggered by Java interpreter
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]