This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: xfail gcc.dg test

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 13:40:46 -0700
Subject: Re: xfail gcc.dg test
References: <200210041827.g94IRQO07760@desire.geoffk.org> <200210041833.OAA28636@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 02:33:09PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> "..foo" and "_.foo" seem to be the simplest choices.  Either is reasonable.

Indeed.  Personally, I think I favour "_.foo", but I don't
have any reason for it -- I just think it looks better.  ;-)



r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: xfail gcc.dg test
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]