This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- To: vargenau at free dot fr
- Cc: Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, <gcc at gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 18:58:42 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: PATCH for Re: http://gcc.gnu.org
On Fri, 4 Oct 2002 vargenau@free.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/testresults/
Okay, this is generated externaly and we cannot easily fix that; in
fact, we probably simply should remove it.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-announce/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/
Fixed manually.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/News.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Contributors.html
Generated automatically using makeinfo, where we are currently in
contact with the maintainer.
> Illegal DOCTYPE
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg00822.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2002-01/msg00551.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-01/msg00663.html
I fail to see the problem here. Does it complain because there are
comments before the DOCTYPE or is the DOCTYPE really an invalid/obsolete
one?
Gerald
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/