Re: -fdump-translation-unit-xml

[Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>]

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 09:22:54PM +0200, Pop Sébastian wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:06:13PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > I do as well.  I've been looking at the current format for a long 
> > while, and for simple little questions, it is ok, however, for things 
> > that take 2 or 3 levels, it seriously breaks down.  The output is time 
> > comsuming to wade through.  

Absolutely.  As nice as the current dumper is, I still rarely use it.


> Yep, I'd like to have something more flexible to browse the tree...
> Why not having a TreeBrowser on the same model as Open64 WHIRL Browser?
> 
> WB> h
> The following commands are available:
>   R: Go to the root of the program unit
>   E: Go to the parent of the current node
>   N: Go to the next node in the subtree chain
[...]

I want a browser that uses the same interface as nethack.  :-)


Phil

-- 
I would therefore like to posit that computing's central challenge, viz. "How
not to make a mess of it," has /not/ been met.
                                                 - Edsger Dijkstra, 1930-2002