This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] Use of build_binary_op


On 26 Sep 2002 09:50:15 -0400, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 09:42, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> This seems like a reasonable model, actually; the initial tree IL can have
>> frontend constructs present, subject to some minor constraints.  The
>> inliner, mudflap, and any frontend-specific optimizers operate on this
>>
> Er, I would like to see mudflap not be frontend-specific.  In my
> opinion, it belongs at the GIMPLE level.  At worst, it should be in
> GENERIC together with the inliner.  I wouldn't want to maintain N
> versions of mudflap.

Right.  I'm suggesting that mudflap run at the same level as the inliner;
it would deal with everything that it knows how to deal with, and ignore
things it doesn't.

Jason


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]