This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
OT: Is this the right list? - [Fwd: #line and g++]
- From: Aldo Dolfi <dolfi at ccrl dot nj dot nec dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:35:48 -0400
- Subject: OT: Is this the right list? - [Fwd: #line and g++]
Hi everybody,
I posted this message yesterday and got no answer. I know
that I should not expect that every question gets its
answer :) but I would like to know at least if this is
the correct list to ask this kind of question or not.
I tried to search for other places but, apart from general
c++ discussion I found nothing. And I think this is an issue
specific of gcc. I did not find anything in docs, either.
Do you have any suggestion?
Thank you
Aldo Dolfi
Aldo Dolfi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem in using #line directive with c++ compiler.
> If I force a line of code in a `cfile.c' to be considered as
> coming from a different source file `source.ext' with a
>
> # line 99 "source.ext"
>
> directive and compile it with g++ it does not work. I mean
> that looking at the object file with `objdump -G' I don't
> find any reference to the string `source.ext' and if I try
> symbolic debugging (ddd) I don't see this file in the list
> of sources.
> Looking at the assembler output (-E) I saw only .stabn are
> inserted and not .stabs "source.ext"
>
> If I compile the same source file with gcc it works.
>
> Are there any differences in the syntax or usage of #line
> between the two compilers?
>
> Thank you!
> Aldo Dolfi