This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: maximize register allocation

From: "tprinceusa" <tprinceusa at netzero dot net>
To: "Richard Henderson" <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Giorgio Alfarano" <nakkore at libero dot it>,<gcc at gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 22:26:49 -0700
Subject: Re: maximize register allocation
References: <3D8214CD.9010403@libero.it> <20020913130238.D410C2CA57@inet1.ywave.com> <20020913170829.GE21760@redhat.com>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard Henderson" <rth@redhat.com>
To: "Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org>
Cc: "Giorgio Alfarano" <nakkore@libero.it>; <gcc@gnu.org>
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: maximize register allocation


> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 06:02:38AM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
> > -frename-registers may be useful on a pipelined machine without hardware 
> > register renaming.  It may also be buggy.
> 
> Any specifics to go with this "buggy" claim?
> 
I get real failures if I try to build gcc with that option, not only more warnings from as about possible resource conflicts
Tim Prince
tprince@computer.org.





-------------------------------------------
Introducing NetZero Long Distance
Unlimited Long Distance only $29.95/ month!
Sign Up Today! www.netzerolongdistance.com

References:
- maximize register allocation
  - From: Giorgio Alfarano
- Re: maximize register allocation
  - From: Tim Prince
- Re: maximize register allocation
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]