This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday, September 12, 2002, at 09:19 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
I have to agree that this is very slippery slope. What stops from extend this to programming models like the AltiVec PIM. Currently GCC supports its own variant of the PIM while all other compilers that implement the specified PIM.But speaking seriously, we Appleites deal with corporate pressure to support various hacks by maintaining our own version of GCC and taking on all the costs that go with that, so I'm wondering why it is that HP can't do the same. While I personally don't have a problem doing a little favor for HP, it's going to be really tricky to avoid charges of favoritism and bias later on if, say, some Apple feature is shot down.
While making GCC support the AltiVec PIM may introduce code into places that are required only to support the PIM, it would be more generally useful to the user base.
Apple obviously ships a modified GCC that supports the spec'd PIM. I would be really nice if users could have code that worked under Linux as well as Mac OS X.
We'd be completely in favor of that, of course. --Matt
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |